Protective effect of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer

被引:8
作者
Gennari, Paolo [1 ,5 ]
Tchaikovski, Svetlana [1 ]
Meszaros, Jozsef [1 ]
Gerken, Michael [2 ]
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika [2 ]
Toth, George [1 ]
Ortmann, Olaf [3 ]
Eggemann, Holm [4 ]
Ignatov, Atanas [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Univ Regensburg, Tumor Ctr, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Regensburg, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Regensburg, Germany
[4] Klinikum Magdeburg, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Magdeburg, Germany
[5] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gerhard Hauptmann Str 35, D-39108 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Cervicalcancer; Radicalhysterectomy; Recurrence; Conization; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RECURRENCE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of pre-operative conization on disease-free sur-vival (DFS) in early-stage cervical cancer.Methods. In this population-based cohort study we analysed from clinical cancer registries to determine DFS of women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer with respect to conization preceding radical hysterectomy performed between January 2010 and December 2015.Results. Out of 993 datasets available for the analysis, 235 patients met the inclusion criteria of the current study. The median follow-up was 5.4 years. During the study period, 28 (11.9%) recurrences were observed. All of these occurred in patients with FIGO stage IB1. For further evaluation, patients with FIGO IB1 tumors <2 cm were further analysed and divided into two groups, based on pre-operative conization. Pre-operative conization was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence (p = 0.007), with only three (5.2%) recurrences in this group (CO) compared to 25 recurrences (21.0%) in the group without conization (NCO) preceding radical hysterectomy. DFS was estimated at 79.0% and 94.8% in NCO and CO, respectively (p = 0.008). After adjustment for other prognostic covariates, conization remained a favourable prognostic factor for DFS (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.08-0.93, p = 0.037). Lymph node involvement was the only unfavourable factor (HR 4.38; 95% CI 1.36-14.14, p = 0.014) in the multivariable analysis.Conclusions. Pre-operative conization is associated with improved DFS in early-stage cervical cancer indepen-dently of the surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 60
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer? [J].
Benoit, Louise ;
Koual, Meriem ;
Huyen-Thu Nguyen-Xuan ;
Balaya, Vincent ;
Nos, Claude ;
Montero-Macias, Rosa ;
Bats, Anne-Sophie .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 303 (01) :231-239
[2]   Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis [J].
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Ghezzi, Fabio ;
Chiva, Luis ;
Gisone, Baldo ;
Pinelli, Ciro ;
Dell'Acqua, Andrea ;
Casarin, Jvan ;
Ditto, Antonino ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (07) :987-992
[3]   Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study [J].
Casarin, Jvan ;
Bogani, Giorgio ;
Papadia, Andrea ;
Ditto, Antonino ;
Pinelli, Ciro ;
Garzon, Simone ;
Donadello, Nicoletta ;
Lagana, Antonio Simone ;
Cromi, Antonella ;
Mueller, Michael ;
Raspagliesi, Francesco ;
Ghezzi, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) :117-123
[4]   Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters [J].
Gennari, Paolo ;
Gerken, Michael ;
Meszaros, Jozsef ;
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika ;
Ortmann, Olaf ;
Eggemann, Holm ;
Ignatov, Atanas .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (02) :503-510
[5]   Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis [J].
Kohler, Christhardt ;
Hertel, Hermann ;
Herrmann, Joerg ;
Marnitz, Simone ;
Mallmann, Peter ;
Favero, Giovanni ;
Plaikner, Andrea ;
Martus, Peter ;
Gajda, Mieczyslaw ;
Schneider, Achim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (05) :845-850
[6]   Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer [J].
Kong, Tae-Wook ;
Chang, Suk-Joon ;
Piao, Xianling ;
Paek, Jiheum ;
Lee, Yonghee ;
Lee, Eun Ju ;
Chun, Mison ;
Ryu, Hee-Sug .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (01) :77-86
[7]   Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard? [J].
Munro, A. ;
Leung, Y. ;
Spilsbury, K. ;
Stewart, C. J. R. ;
Semmens, J. ;
Codde, J. ;
Williams, V. ;
O'Leary, P. ;
Steel, N. ;
Cohen, P. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 (02) :258-263
[8]   Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer [J].
Nagao, Yukari ;
Yokoi, Akira ;
Yoshida, Kosuke ;
Sumi, Masanori ;
Yoshihara, Masato ;
Tamauchi, Satoshi ;
Ikeda, Yoshiki ;
Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa ;
Nishino, Kimihiro ;
Niimi, Kaoru ;
Kajiyama, Hiroaki .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
[9]  
PIVER MS, 1974, OBSTET GYNECOL, V44, P265
[10]   Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer [J].
Ramirez, Pedro T. ;
Frumovitz, Michael ;
Pareja, Rene ;
Lopez, Aldo ;
Vieira, Marcelo ;
Ribeiro, Reitan ;
Buda, Alessandro ;
Yan, Xiaojian ;
Yao Shuzhong ;
Chetty, Naven ;
Isla, David ;
Tamura, Mariano ;
Zhu, Tao ;
Robledo, Kristy P. ;
Gebski, Val ;
Asher, Rebecca ;
Behan, Vanessa ;
Nicklin, James L. ;
Coleman, Robert L. ;
Obermair, Andreas .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20) :1895-1904