Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes

被引:35
|
作者
Casarin, Jvan [1 ]
Multinu, Francesco [1 ]
Tortorella, Lucia [1 ]
Cappuccio, Serena [1 ]
Weaver, Amy L. [1 ]
Ghezzi, Fabio [2 ]
Cilby, William [1 ]
Kumar, Amanika [1 ]
Langstraat, Carrie [1 ]
Glaser, Gretchen [1 ]
Mariani, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Insubria, Varese, Italy
关键词
complications; endometrial cancer; morbidity; robotic surgery; sentinel lymph node; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SURGERY; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2019-000672
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives It is unclear if sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved surgical outcomes compared with lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer. In this study we aimed to compare peri-operative surgical outcomes and treatment-related morbidity in patients who underwent robotic-assisted sentinel lymph node biopsy versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods Records were reviewed of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages I-III endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2016. For the purpose of this analysis we focused on the actual patients who had sentinel node biopsy only (ie, excluding those who had an associated lymphadenectomy either for failed mapping or during the learning curve). We also excluded patients who had para-aortic lymph node dissection from the lymphadenectomy group. Perioperative and 30-day surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent sentinel lymph node assessment and those who had pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting derived from propensity scores was used to minimize allocation bias in the comparison of outcomes between groups. Results A total of 621 patients were analyzed: 188 (30.3%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy, 198 (31.9%) with pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 235 (37.8%) with hysterectomy alone. Inverse probability of treatment weights analysis balanced for baseline characteristics (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson co-morbidity index, parity, prior cesarean section, and previous abdominal operation) showed no significant differences in intra-operative and post-operative complications, re-admissions, and re-operations between the groups. Compared with pelvic lymphadenectomy, the sentinel lymph node biopsy group had a shorter mean operative time (138.0 vs 222.8 min, p<0.001) and less median blood loss (50 vs 100 mL, p<0.001). Sentinel lymph node biopsy also was not associated with worse morbidity compared with hysterectomy alone. Conclusions Introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy reduces operative times and improves peri-operative surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted staging for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer without worsening the morbidity of hysterectomy alone.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sentinel lymph node biopsy at robotic-assisted hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer
    El-Achi, Vanessa
    Burling, Michael
    Al-Aker, Murad
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05) : 1111 - 1115
  • [2] Sentinel lymph node biopsy at robotic-assisted hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer
    Vanessa El-Achi
    Michael Burling
    Murad Al-Aker
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1111 - 1115
  • [3] Perioperative outcomes and disparities in utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Byrne, Maureen E.
    Latif, Nawar A.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 (03) : 758 - 766
  • [4] Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling in Robot-Assisted Staging of Endometrial Cancer
    Curcio, Erin
    Miller, Briana
    Giglio, Alexandra
    Akoluk, Arda
    Erler, Brian
    Bosscher, James
    Borowsky, Mark
    Hicks, Verda
    ElSahwi, Karim
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 114 (11) : 680 - 685
  • [5] A prospective investigation of fluorescence imaging to detect sentinel lymph nodes at robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging
    Paley, Pamela J.
    Veljovich, Dan S.
    Press, Joshua Z.
    Isacson, Christina
    Pizer, Ellen
    Shah, Chirag
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (01) : 117.e1 - 117.e7
  • [6] Oncologic Outcome of Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer
    Ignatov, Atanas
    Meszaros, Jozsef
    Ivros, Stylianos
    Gennari, Paolo
    Ignatov, Tanja
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [7] Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    Herraiz, Miguel A.
    Magrina, Javier F.
    Fasero, Maria
    Vidart, Jose A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 165 (02) : 289 - 294
  • [8] Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging: A comparison of colorimetric and fluorescence imaging
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Bravo, Ricardo A. Molero
    Rakowski, Joseph A.
    James, Jeffrey A.
    Jeppson, Corinne N.
    Ingersoll, Susan B.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 126 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [9] Update on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Surgical Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma
    Eriksson, Ane Gerda Z.
    Davidson, Ben
    Trent, Pernille Bjerre
    Eyjolfsdottir, Brynhildur
    Dahl, Gunn Fallas
    Wang, Yun
    Staff, Anne Cathrine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (14)
  • [10] vNOTES Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Description of Technique and Perioperative Outcomes
    Wang, Yanzhou
    Deng, Li
    Tang, Shuai
    Dou, Yuya
    Yao, Yuanyang
    Li, Yudi
    Deng, Yuan
    Chen, Yong
    Liang, Zhiqing
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 1254 - 1261