Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry

被引:65
|
作者
Goodney, Philip P. [1 ]
Nolan, Brian W. [1 ]
Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [1 ]
Cronenwett, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03765 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; JUGULAR-VEIN; EVERSION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; IMPROVEMENT; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Level I evidence shows conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty results in lower rates of restenosis. However, whether this information has affected practice patterns and outcomes in real-world vascular surgery settings is unclear. Methods: Within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE), we studied 2981 patients undergoing 2981 first-time CEAs between January 1, 2003, and June 31, 2008. Rates of restenosis (defined by duplex ultrasound imaging at the 1-year follow-up) were estimated using life-table analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify multivariable predictors of postoperative restenosis <= 1 year. Results: Across 58 surgeons and 11 hospitals, we studied 2611 conventional CEAs (88% of all CEAs) and 370 eversion CEAs (12% of all CEAs). Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 1-35 months). The proportion of conventional CEAs performed with patching increased from 87% to 96% (P < .001) between 2003 and 2008, whereas eversion CEA declined from 18% to 5% (P < .001). Restenosis occurred in 303 patients (10%); by life-table analysis, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-6.8%). Restenoses were most commonly noncritical: 50%-79% restenosis in 7.9%, 80%-99% restenosis in 1.7%, and occlusion in 0.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences in 80% to 100% restenosis by procedure type (2% in conventional CEA, 6% in eversion CEA, P < .002), the year of procedure (3.2% in 2003, 0% in 2008; P < .03), and use of patching in conventional CEA (2.9% no patch, 1% with patch; P < .008). By multivariable analysis, absence of patching (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0), contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis >80% (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5), and dialysis dependence (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) were independently associated with a higher risk of an 80% to 100% restenosis. Of the 51 patients with 80% to 99% restenosis, 14 underwent reintervention <= 1 year, comprising 4 reoperations and 10 carotid artery stent procedures. Of the 15 patients with a carotid occlusion <= 1 year, transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2 and a disabling stroke in 1. Conclusions: In our region, restenosis after CEA, especially clinically significant restenosis <= 1 year after surgery, decreased slightly over time. This improvement in outcome was associated with several factors, including an increase in patching after conventional CEA, a process of care that was studied and encouraged within our vascular study group. These results highlight the utility of regional quality-improvement efforts in improving outcomes in vascular surgery. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:897-905.)
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Statins on Early and Late Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy and the Rate of Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Restenosis
    AbuRahma, Ali F.
    Srivastava, Mohit
    Stone, Patrick A.
    Richmond, Bryan K.
    AbuRahma, Zachary
    Jackson, Will
    Dean, L. Scott
    Mousa, Albeir Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 220 (04) : 481 - 487
  • [2] Restenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy
    Kobayashi, Norikata
    Takasaki, Morio
    Ito, Kaname
    Maruyama, Daisuke
    Ishii, Daizo
    Morita, Kenichi
    Satow, Tetsu
    Kataoka, Hiroharu
    Iihara, Koji
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (02)
  • [3] Acute Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy: Time for a Paradigm Shift? Multicenter Experience With Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting With or Without Intracranial Tandem Occlusion Thrombectomy
    Spiotta, Alejandro M.
    Vargas, Jan
    Zuckerman, Scott
    Mokin, Maxim
    Ahmed, Azam
    Mocco, J.
    Turner, Raymond D.
    Turk, Aquilla S.
    Chaudry, M. Imran
    Myers, Phil
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (04) : 403 - 409
  • [4] Effect of Patching on Reducing Restenosis in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial
    Malas, Mahmoud
    Glebova, Natalia O.
    Hughes, Susan E.
    Voeks, Jenifer H.
    Qazi, Umair
    Moore, Wesley S.
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Howard, George
    Llinas, Rafael
    Brott, Thomas G.
    STROKE, 2015, 46 (03) : 757 - 761
  • [5] Polyester vs. bovine pericardial patching during carotid endarterectomy: early neurologic events and incidence of restenosis
    Neuhauser, B
    Oldenburg, WA
    CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 11 (06): : 465 - 470
  • [6] Management of Restenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting
    Paraskevas, Kosmas, I
    Dardik, Alan
    Gloviczki, Peter
    ANGIOLOGY, 2023, 74 (04) : 305 - 307
  • [7] Role of carotid duplex in the assessment of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting
    Szegedi, Istvan
    Potvorszki, Fanni
    Meszaros, Zsofia Reka
    Daniel, Cecilia
    Csiba, Laszlo
    Olah, Laszlo
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Prosthetic bypass for restenosis after endarterectomy or stenting of the carotid artery
    Illuminati, Giulio
    Belmonte, Romain
    Schneider, Fabrice
    Pizzardi, Giulia
    Calio, Francesco G.
    Ricco, Jean-Baptiste
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 1664 - 1672
  • [9] Nationwide Trends in Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the Post-CREST Era
    Cole, Tyler S.
    Mezher, Andrew W.
    Catapano, Joshua S.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Baranoski, Jacob F.
    Nakaji, Peter
    Albuquerque, Felipe C.
    Lawton, Michael T.
    Little, Andrew S.
    Ducruet, Andrew F.
    STROKE, 2020, 51 (02) : 579 - 587
  • [10] Clinical Significance of Internal Carotid Artery Restenosis Following Carotid Endarterectomy
    Radak, Djordje
    Tanaskovic, Slobodan
    Babic, Srdjan
    Aleksic, Nikola
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2012, 140 (7-8) : 528 - 532