Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry

被引:65
作者
Goodney, Philip P. [1 ]
Nolan, Brian W. [1 ]
Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [1 ]
Cronenwett, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03765 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; JUGULAR-VEIN; EVERSION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; IMPROVEMENT; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Level I evidence shows conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty results in lower rates of restenosis. However, whether this information has affected practice patterns and outcomes in real-world vascular surgery settings is unclear. Methods: Within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE), we studied 2981 patients undergoing 2981 first-time CEAs between January 1, 2003, and June 31, 2008. Rates of restenosis (defined by duplex ultrasound imaging at the 1-year follow-up) were estimated using life-table analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify multivariable predictors of postoperative restenosis <= 1 year. Results: Across 58 surgeons and 11 hospitals, we studied 2611 conventional CEAs (88% of all CEAs) and 370 eversion CEAs (12% of all CEAs). Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 1-35 months). The proportion of conventional CEAs performed with patching increased from 87% to 96% (P < .001) between 2003 and 2008, whereas eversion CEA declined from 18% to 5% (P < .001). Restenosis occurred in 303 patients (10%); by life-table analysis, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-6.8%). Restenoses were most commonly noncritical: 50%-79% restenosis in 7.9%, 80%-99% restenosis in 1.7%, and occlusion in 0.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences in 80% to 100% restenosis by procedure type (2% in conventional CEA, 6% in eversion CEA, P < .002), the year of procedure (3.2% in 2003, 0% in 2008; P < .03), and use of patching in conventional CEA (2.9% no patch, 1% with patch; P < .008). By multivariable analysis, absence of patching (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0), contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis >80% (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5), and dialysis dependence (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) were independently associated with a higher risk of an 80% to 100% restenosis. Of the 51 patients with 80% to 99% restenosis, 14 underwent reintervention <= 1 year, comprising 4 reoperations and 10 carotid artery stent procedures. Of the 15 patients with a carotid occlusion <= 1 year, transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2 and a disabling stroke in 1. Conclusions: In our region, restenosis after CEA, especially clinically significant restenosis <= 1 year after surgery, decreased slightly over time. This improvement in outcome was associated with several factors, including an increase in patching after conventional CEA, a process of care that was studied and encouraged within our vascular study group. These results highlight the utility of regional quality-improvement efforts in improving outcomes in vascular surgery. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:897-905.)
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: Perioperative (30-day) results [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Khan, JH ;
Robinson, PA ;
Saiedy, S ;
Short, YS ;
Boland, JP ;
White, JF ;
Conley, Y .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (06) :998-1006
[2]   Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: Long-term follow-up [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Robinson, PA ;
Saiedy, S ;
Khan, JH ;
Boland, JP .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :222-232
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD000071.PUB2
[4]   Treatment of carotid stent restenosis [J].
Ansel, GM .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2003, 58 (01) :93-94
[5]   A time-dependent discrimination index for survival data [J].
Antolini, L ;
Boracchi, P ;
Biganzoli, E .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (24) :3927-3944
[6]   Fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal operative protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty [J].
Archie, JP .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (04) :724-735
[7]   PATCH ANGIOPLASTY IN CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - ADVANTAGES, CONCERNS, AND CONTROVERSIES [J].
AWAD, IA ;
LITTLE, JR .
STROKE, 1989, 20 (03) :417-422
[8]   Durability of carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenoses [J].
Ballotta, E ;
Da Giau, G ;
Piccoli, A ;
Baracchini, C .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (02) :270-278
[9]   Carotid endarterectomy in high-risk patients: A challenge for endovascular procedure protocols [J].
Ballotta, E ;
Da Giau, G ;
Baracchini, C ;
Manara, R .
SURGERY, 2004, 135 (01) :74-80
[10]   Carotid eversion endarterectomy: Perioperative outcome and restenosis incidence [J].
Ballotta, E ;
Da Giau, G ;
Baracchini, C ;
Manara, R .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 16 (04) :422-429