Treatment of olive mill wastewaters by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes

被引:113
|
作者
Coskun, Tamer [1 ]
Debik, Eyup [1 ]
Demir, Neslihan Manav [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Esenler, Turkey
关键词
Centrifuging; Nanofiltration; Olive mill wastewater (OMW); Reverse osmosis; Ultrafiltration; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; INDUSTRY; COMBINATION; REUSE; DETOXIFICATION; EFFLUENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.034
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Treatment of olive mill wastewaters (OMW) by membrane techniques were investigated in this study. For this purpose. OMW was centrifuged, and filtered via UC010 ultrafiltration membrane followed by filtration through NP010, NP030, and NF270 nanofiltration membranes, and XLE and BW30 reverse osmosis membranes. Besides, skipping the ultrafiltration step, the centrifuged OMW was filtered through NP010 and NP030 membranes in order to evaluate the performance of the centrifuging process as a pretreatment option. For the OMW percolated through ultrafiltration membranes, the membrane fluxes reached values of up to 21.2, 5.2, 28.3, 15.5, and 12.6 L m(-2)h(-1) for NP010, NP030, NF270, XLE, and BW30 membranes, respectively. The maximum COD removal efficiencies obtained at 10 bars were 60.1%. 59.4% and 79.2% for NP010, NP030, and NF270 nanofiltration membranes, respectively, while they were 96.3% and 96.2% for XLE and BW30 reverse osmosis membranes, respectively. Besides, conductivity removal efficiencies obtained at 25 bars were 93.2% and 94.8% for XLE and BW30 membranes. respectively. Obtained efficiencies are higher than those obtained in the treatment of OMWs with other treatment methods. Thus, it was concluded that membrane processes are a good alternative for the treatment of OMWs. Additionally, the centrifuging process was found to be a promising pretreatment method. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 70
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFECT OF CENTRIFUGATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION AS A PRELIMINARY TREATMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES IN OLIVE OIL MILL WASTEWATER (OMW)
    Coskun, Tamer
    Demir, Neslihan Manav
    Debik, Eyup
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2012, 21 (05): : 1158 - 1164
  • [2] Performances of Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater
    Coskun, Tamer
    Yildirim, Asuman
    Balcik, Cigdem
    Demir, Neslihan Manav
    Debik, Eyup
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2013, 41 (05) : 463 - 468
  • [3] Performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in metal effluent treatment
    Liu Feini
    Zhang Guoliang
    Meng Qin
    Zhang Hongzi
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 16 (03) : 441 - 445
  • [4] Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes for the improvement of must quality
    Pati, Sandra
    La Notte, Domenico
    Clodoveo, Maria Lisa
    Cicco, Giuseppe
    Esti, Marco
    EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 239 (04) : 595 - 602
  • [5] Adsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment
    Nghiem, LD
    Schäfer, AI
    Waite, TD
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (4-5) : 265 - 272
  • [6] Comparison of the performance of UF membranes in olive mill wastewaters treatment
    Cassano, A.
    Conidi, C.
    Drioli, E.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (10) : 3197 - 3204
  • [7] Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Mondal, S.
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 322 (01) : 162 - 170
  • [8] Dynamic characterization of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes
    Lebrun, RE
    Xu, YZ
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 34 (08) : 1629 - 1641
  • [9] Tannery Effluent Treatment by Nanofiltration, Reverse Osmosis and Chitosan Modified Membranes
    Zakmout, Asmaa
    Sadi, Fatma
    Portugal, Carla A. M.
    Crespo, Joao G.
    Velizarov, Svetlozar
    MEMBRANES, 2020, 10 (12) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents
    Turan, M
    Ates, A
    Inanc, B
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (12) : 355 - 360