Inclusive Higher Education Access for Underrepresented Groups: It Matters, But How Can Universities Measure It?

被引:10
作者
Veidemane, Anete [1 ]
Kaiser, Frans [1 ]
Craciun, Daniela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Ctr Higher Educ Policy Studies, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
access; higher education; indicators; rankings; social inclusion; underrepresented students; university; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.17645/si.v9i3.4163
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Measuring access to higher education for underrepresented groups is a relevant yet challenging task. The article shows that while social inclusion is recognised as a priority, policymakers, academics, and institutional leaders struggle to define, operationalise, and measure it. This makes answering the question of what constitutes a socially inclusive higher education institution quite difficult. While the answer to this question may be context-specific, there is a clear need for a set of commonly defined indicators that allow higher education institutions to measure their progress throughout time and in relation to others. The article synthesises insights from policy, practise, and scientific research to identify which indicators are the most promising for assessing the access of under-representative students to higher education. By discussing indicator relevance, validity and feasibility, the article contributes to the quest for internationally comparable social inclusion indicators of underrepresented student groups.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 57
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research
    Adcock, R
    Collier, D
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) : 529 - 546
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, The European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the 2017 list of critical raw materials for the EU
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, EUROPE 2020 STRAT SM
  • [4] The rise of agentic inclusion in the UK universities: maintaining reputation through (formal) diversification
    Baltaru, Roxana-Diana
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (01) : 229 - 242
  • [5] Bologna Process, 2015, WIND PART EQ GROWTH
  • [6] Bologna Process, 2020, ADV GROUP 1 SOC DIM
  • [7] Bottani N., 1994, Making education count: Developing and using international indicators, P21
  • [8] Cave M., 1997, The use of performance indicators in higher education
  • [9] Chung E., 2014, Educational Research and Reviews, V9, P1224, DOI [10.5897/ERR2014.1944, DOI 10.5897/ERR2014.1944]
  • [10] Claeys-Kulik A. L., 2019, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in European: Results from the INVITED project