Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence

被引:54
作者
Baum, Seth D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Global Catastroph Risk Inst, POB 40364, Washington, DC 20016 USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ethics; Social choice; Standing; Measurement; Aggregation; PREFERENCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-017-0760-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A major approach to the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) is to use social choice, in which the AI is designed to act according to the aggregate views of society. This is found in the AI ethics of "coherent extrapolated volition" and "bottom-up ethics". This paper shows that the normative basis of AI social choice ethics is weak due to the fact that there is no one single aggregate ethical view of society. Instead, the design of social choice AI faces three sets of decisions: standing, concerning whose ethics views are included; measurement, concerning how their views are identified; and aggregation, concerning how individual views are combined to a single view that will guide AI behavior. These decisions must be made up front in the initial AI design-designers cannot "let the AI figure it out". Each set of decisions poses difficult ethical dilemmas with major consequences for AI behavior, with some decision options yielding pathological or even catastrophic results. Furthermore, non-social choice ethics face similar issues, such as whether to count future generations or the AI itself. These issues can be more important than the question of whether or not to use social choice ethics. Attention should focus on these issues, not on social choice.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 176
页数:12
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Adams F.C., 2008, GLOBAL CATASTROPHIC, P33
[2]   Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent [J].
Allen, C ;
Varner, G ;
Zinser, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 12 (03) :251-261
[3]   Artificial morality: Top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches [J].
Allen C. ;
Smit I. ;
Wallach W. .
Ethics and Information Technology, 2005, 7 (3) :149-155
[4]   What's Wrong With Factory Farming? [J].
Anomaly, Jonathan .
PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS, 2015, 8 (03) :246-254
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHANG ATT GAY MARR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Affective Computing
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1785, Essai sur l'application de l'analyse a la probabilite des decisions rendues a la pluralite des voix
[9]  
Arrhenius G., 2011, Advanced series on mathematical psychology, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1142/9789814368018_0001, 10.1142/9789814368018_0001]
[10]  
Arrhenius Gustaf., 2005, DEMOCRACY UNBOUND, P14