Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

被引:48
|
作者
Troisi, Roberto I. [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Tomassini, Federico [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
机构
[1] UZ Ghent, Dept Gen Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantat, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Louvain Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; PORTAL FLOW MODULATION; LEFT-LOBE GRAFT; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN; WEIGHT RATIO; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; PORTACAVAL-SHUNT; VENOUS-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results: From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions: GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adult to pediatric living donor liver transplantation for portal cavernoma
    Zhang, Mingman
    Guo, Chunbao
    Pu, Conglun
    Ren, Zhimei
    Li, Yingcun
    Kang, Quan
    Jin, Xianqing
    Yan, Lvnan
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 39 (09) : 888 - 897
  • [42] (D+10) MELD as a novel predictor of patient and graft survival after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation
    Soin, Arvinder Singh
    Goja, Sanjay
    Yadav, Sanjay Kumar
    Tamang, Tseten Yonjen
    Rastogi, Amit
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Thiagrajan, Srinivasan
    Raut, Vikram
    Babu, Raghvendra Y.
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Saraf, Neeraj
    Choudhary, Narendra Singh
    Vohara, Vijay
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (05)
  • [43] The role of adult living donor liver transplantation and recent advances
    Lauterio, Andrea
    Di Sandro, Stefano
    Giacomoni, Alessandro
    De Carlis, Luciano
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 9 (04) : 431 - 445
  • [44] Splenic Artery Ligation Versus Splenectomy for Portal Inflow Modulation in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant: Effects on Early Graft Function, A Prospective Study
    Taha, Ahmed M. I.
    Temerik, Abdallah R.
    Eweis, Mohamed K.
    Sayed, Mostafa M.
    Hassan, Ramy A.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 22 (10) : 794 - 799
  • [45] Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
    Elshawy, Mohamed
    Toshima, Takeo
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    Kubo, Yuichiro
    Ikeda, Shinichiro
    Ikegami, Toru
    Arakaki, Shingo
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Mori, Masaki
    SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [47] Modulation of graft vascular inflow guided by flowmetry and manometry in liver transplantation
    Chan, See Ching
    Lo, Chung Mau
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Sharr, William W.
    Cheung, Tan To
    Tsang, Simon H. Y.
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 10 (06) : 649 - 656
  • [48] Adult living donor liver imaging
    Cai, Larry
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Roberts, John P.
    Wang, Zhen J.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (03): : 207 - 214
  • [49] Adult living-donor liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy
    Akamatsu, Nobuhisa
    Fukuda, Kaito
    Nishioka, Yujiro
    Miyata, Akinori
    Ichida, Akihiko
    Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni
    Kaneko, Junichi
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2025,
  • [50] Living donor liver transplantation with left liver graft
    Masetti, M
    Siniscalchi, A
    Pietri, LD
    Braglia, V
    Di Benedetto, F
    Cautero, N
    Begliomini, B
    Romano, A
    Miller, CM
    Ramacciato, G
    Pinna, AD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (10) : 1713 - 1716