Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

被引:48
|
作者
Troisi, Roberto I. [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Tomassini, Federico [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
机构
[1] UZ Ghent, Dept Gen Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantat, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Louvain Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; PORTAL FLOW MODULATION; LEFT-LOBE GRAFT; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN; WEIGHT RATIO; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; PORTACAVAL-SHUNT; VENOUS-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results: From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions: GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Graft Inflow Modulation in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Hepatic Hemodynamic Changes in Splenic Artery Ligation and Splenectomy
    Su, Che-Min
    Chou, Tsung-Ching
    Yang, Tsung-Han
    Lin, Yih-Jyh
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 27
  • [32] Risk Factors of SFSS in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using the Right Liver: A Single-Center Analysis of 217 Cases
    Lei, Jian-Yong
    Wang, Wen-Tao
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (117) : 1491 - 1497
  • [33] Importance of the temporary portocaval shunt during adult living donor liver transplantation
    Sanchez-Cabus, Santiago
    Fondevila, Constantino
    Calatayud, David
    Ferrer, Joana
    Taura, Pilar
    Fuster, Jose
    Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas, Juan
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 (02) : 174 - 183
  • [34] Left Lobe Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Small Grafts and Hemiportocaval Shunts in the Prevention of Small-for-Size Syndrome
    Botha, Jean F.
    Langnas, Alan N.
    Campos, B. Daniel
    Grant, Wendy J.
    Freise, Christopher E.
    Ascher, Nancy L.
    Mercer, David F.
    Roberts, John P.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (05) : 649 - 657
  • [35] Is graft size a major risk factor in living-donor adult liver transplantation?
    Shimada, M
    Ijichi, H
    Yonemura, Y
    Harada, N
    Shiotani, S
    Ninomiya, M
    Yoshizumi, T
    Soejima, Y
    Suehiro, T
    Maehara, Y
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 17 (06) : 310 - 316
  • [36] Graft Inflow Modulation by Splenic Artery Ligation for Portal Hyperperfusion Does Not Decrease Rates of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Control Trial
    Pamecha, Viniyendra
    Tharun, Gattu
    Patil, Nilesh Sadashiv
    Mohapatra, Nihar
    Kumar, Anubhav
    Thapar, Shalini
    Sindwani, Gaurav
    Dhingra, Udit
    Yadav, Anil
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2025, 281 (04) : 561 - 572
  • [37] Intraoperative Factors Associated With Early Recipient Death After Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant
    Tourky, Mohamed Sabry
    Salman, Ahmed Abdallah
    Salman, Mohamed Abdalla
    Abdelfatah, Mostafa Mahmoud
    Taha, Ahmed E.
    Hagag, Hany
    Youssef, Mohamed Yousef Salah
    Arafa, Mohamed S.
    Khattab, Sara A.
    Borham, Marwan Mansour
    Moustafa, Ahmed
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 19 (08) : 817 - 825
  • [38] Portal flow modulation in living donor liver transplantation: review with a focus on splenectomy
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Mori, Masaki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [39] Impact of donor age and recipient status on left-lobe graft for living donor adult liver transplantation
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Soejima, Yuji
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Ikegami, Toru
    Harada, Noboru
    Kayashima, Hiroto
    Yamashita, Yo-Ichi
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 21 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [40] Leaning to the Left Increasing the Donor Pool by Using the Left Lobe, Outcomes of the Largest Single-Center North American Experience of Left Lobe Adult-to-adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Halazun, Karim J.
    Przybyszewski, Eric M.
    Griesemer, Adam D.
    Cherqui, Daniel
    Michelassi, Fabrizio
    Guarrera, James V.
    Kato, Tomoaki
    Brown, Robert S., Jr.
    Emond, Jean C.
    Samstein, Benjamin
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (03) : 448 - 456