A study on contralateral breast surface dose for various tangential field techniques and the impact of set-up error on this dose

被引:8
作者
Prabhakar, R. [1 ]
Haresh, K. P. [1 ]
Julka, P. K. [1 ]
Ganesh, T. [1 ]
Rath, G. K. [1 ]
Joshi, R. C. [1 ]
Sasindran, M. [1 ]
Naik, K. K. [1 ]
Sridhar, P. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
contralateral breast dose; MOSFET; enhanced dynamic wedge; IMRT;
D O I
10.1007/BF03178408
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The risk of inducing contralateral breast (CLB) cancer in patients undergoing tangential field irradiation for the treatment of breast cancer is a serious concern in radiation oncology. A bilateral breast phantom made of wax attached onto the Alderson Rando phantom was used for studying the CLB dose for techniques using physical wedges, EDWs, IMRT and open fields. The skin dose to the CLB was measured at four different points (3 cm from the medial border of the tangential field (PI), nipple (P3), axilla (P4), midpoint between P3 and P1 (P2)). The highest measured dose occurred at P I with the 60 degrees physical wedges; it was 15.3 % of the dose at isocentre. Similarly, the dose measured at P3 (nipple) with 60 degrees physical wedges was 1.90 times higher than the dose with 60 degrees EDWs. The dose at P I for IMRT (7.8%) was almost the same as that for the open field (8.7%). The skin dose measured at the nipple was 2.1 - 10.9 % of the isocentre dose. The highest CLB doses were contributed by medial wedged fields. The dose to the CLB can be reduced by using IMRT or avoiding wedging the medial tangential fields. A set-up error in the longitudinal direction has little impact on the CLB dose. Set-up errors > 1 cm in the vertical and lateral directions have significant impact on the CLB dose.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 45
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   CANCER IN THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BOICE, JD ;
HARVEY, EB ;
BLETTNER, M ;
STOVALL, M ;
FLANNERY, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (12) :781-785
[2]   A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation [J].
Chang, SX ;
Deschesne, KM ;
Cullip, TJ ;
Parker, SA ;
Earnhart, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05) :1305-1314
[3]   Investigation of the use of MOSFET for clinical IMRT dosimetric verification [J].
Chuang, CF ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Xia, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) :1109-1115
[4]   Active minimisation of radiation scatter during breast radiotherapy: Management implications for young patients with good-prognosis primary neoplasms [J].
Epstein, RJ ;
Kelly, SA ;
Cook, M ;
Bateman, A ;
Paddick, I ;
Kam, KC ;
Dunn, P ;
Hanham, IW ;
Dale, RG ;
Price, PM .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1996, 40 (01) :69-74
[5]   DOSE TO THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST DUE TO PRIMARY BREAST IRRADIATION [J].
FRAASS, BA ;
ROBERSON, PL ;
LICHTER, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (03) :485-497
[6]   Dose to contralateral breast: A comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques [J].
Kelly, CA ;
Wang, XY ;
Chu, JCH ;
Hartsell, WF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (03) :727-732
[7]   THE EFFECT OF A DYNAMIC WEDGE IN THE MEDIAL TANGENTIAL FIELD UPON THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST DOSE [J].
MCPARLAND, BJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (06) :1515-1520
[8]   COMPARISON OF CONTRALATERAL BREAST DOSES FROM 1/2 BEAM BLOCK AND ISOCENTRIC TREATMENT TECHNIQUES FOR PATIENTS TREATED WITH PRIMARY BREAST IRRADIATION WITH CO-60 [J].
TERCILLA, O ;
KRASIN, F ;
LAWNTSAO, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (01) :205-210
[9]  
Warlick W B, 1997, Med Dosim, V22, P185, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(97)00015-0
[10]  
Weides C D, 1995, Med Dosim, V20, P287, DOI 10.1016/0958-3947(95)02011-X