Personality and temperament traits as predictors of conscious risky car driving

被引:11
作者
Baran, Paulina [1 ,3 ]
Zielinski, Piotr [2 ]
Dziuda, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Inst Aviat Med, Dept Psychophysiol Measurements & Human Factor Re, Ul Krasinskiego 54-56, PL-01755 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Mil Inst Aviat Med, Dept Aviat Psychol, Ul Krasinskiego 54-56, PL-01755 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski Univ, Inst Psychol, Ul Woycickiego 1-3, PL-01938 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Risk taking; Risk perception; Personality traits; Temperament traits; Car drivers; Road safety; SENSATION SEEKING; IMPULSIVENESS; BEHAVIOR; VENTURESOMENESS; ANGER; PERCEPTION; ACCIDENTS; OFFENSES; EMPATHY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105361
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The study aims at checking which of the selected personality and temperament traits allow to predict the tendencies of car drivers to consciously take risk on the road. Therefore, the initially studied group of 306 car drivers (143 females) aged 19-65 was divided into two subgroups - with higher (N = 152) and lower (N = 154) risk perception scores, measured by the Road Traffic Behaviours Questionnaire KZD-P. The tendency to take risks while driving a car was measured by the Road Traffic Behaviours Questionnaire KZD. Selected personality and temperament traits were assessed using the Personality Inventory NEO-FFI, the Impulsiveness Questionnaire IVE and the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour - Temperament Inventory FCZ-KT. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out separately in these two groups of drivers. It has been shown that psychological traits are indeed significant predictors of risk-taking while driving. Thus, Conscientiousness and Empathy turned out to be negatively associated solely with conscious risking on the road, while Impulsiveness was an important factor for risky driving regardless of risk perception. Additionally, age and driving experience were significant predictors of risk-taking only among the drivers who were aware of the risks on the road. Based on the results, it seems that risk perception should be taken into account when searching for determinants of risk-taking in road traffic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Measuring risky risky driving behaviours among young drivers: Development of a scale for the Oman setting [J].
Al Reesi, Hamed ;
Freeman, James ;
Davey, Jeremy ;
Al Adawi, Samir ;
Al Maniri, Abdullah .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 55 :78-89
[2]   Driver anger in France: The relationships between sex, gender roles, trait and state driving anger and appraisals made while driving [J].
Albentosa, Julie ;
Stephens, Amanda N. ;
Sullman, Mark J. M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 52 :127-137
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, J AMN STAT ASS
[4]   The influence of anger, impulsivity, sensation seeking and driver attitudes on risky driving behaviour among post-graduate university students in Durban, South Africa [J].
Bachoo, Shaneel ;
Bhagwanjee, Anil ;
Govender, Kaymarlin .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 55 :67-76
[5]  
Bak-Gajda D., 2010, PSYCHOL TRANSPORT RO
[6]  
Baran P., 2015, Czasopismo Psychologiczne, V21, P253, DOI [10.14691/CPPJ.21.2.253, DOI 10.14691/CPPJ.21.2.253]
[7]   Impulsivity and driver behaviors, offences and accident involvement: A systematic review [J].
Bicaksiz, Pinar ;
Ozkan, Turker .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 38 :194-223
[8]   Social Norms and Risk Perception: Predictors of Distracted Driving Behavior Among Novice Adolescent Drivers [J].
Carter, Patrick M. ;
Bingham, C. Raymond ;
Zakrajsek, Jennifer S. ;
Shope, Jean T. ;
Sayer, Tina B. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2014, 54 (05) :S32-S41
[9]   Risky and aggressive driving in young adults: Personality matters [J].
Constantinou, Elena ;
Panayiotou, Georgia ;
Konstantinou, Nikos ;
Loutsiou-Ladd, Anthi ;
Kapardis, Andreas .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2011, 43 (04) :1323-1331
[10]   4 WAYS 5 FACTORS ARE BASIC [J].
COSTA, PT ;
MCCRAE, RR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1992, 13 (06) :653-665