Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?

被引:50
作者
Andolfi, Ciro [1 ,3 ]
Adamic, Brittany [1 ]
Oommen, Jerry [2 ]
Gundeti, Mohan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Comer Childrens Hosp, Pediat Urol,Sect Urol,Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Univ Chicago Med, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Comer Childrens Hosp, Sect Adult & Pediat Urol,Dept Surg,Ctr Simulat, 5841 S Maryland Ave,Rm J-664, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Pediatric urology; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Robotic pyeloplasty; Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; HYNES DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; SURGERY; LONG; METAANALYSIS; STANDARD; YOUNGER; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Open pyeloplasty (OP) has been the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) since it was first described by Anderson and Hynes. The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat UPJO in the pediatric population has increased in recent years, due to decreased morbidity and shorter recovery times. Recently, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has seen a steady expansion. Unlike laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), RALP comes with a more manageable learning curve aided by specialized technological advantages such as high-resolution three-dimensional view, tremor filtration with motion scaling, and highly dexterous wrist-like instruments. With this review, we aim to highlight the trend toward robotic pyeloplasty over laparoscopy and current available evidence on outcomes. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and we critically reviewed the available literature on the use of laparoscopy and robotic technology in pediatric patients with UPJO. Results Overall, we selected 19 original articles and 5 meta-analyses. The available literature showed that the robotic approach to the UPJO allowed for decreased operative times, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication rates, with success rates comparable to LP. Conflicting results persist regarding robotic platform and equipment costs. Conclusion While laparoscopy requires advanced skills for complex reconstructive procedures, such as pyeloplasty, robot-assisted surgery offers the valuable potential of making MIS more accessible to these types of procedure. Robotic technology has contributed to shortening the learning curve by acting as a bridge between open and endoscopic approach. There is still a strong need for higher quality evidence in the form of prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as further cost-effectiveness analyses. As robotic surgical technology spreads, future systems will be developed, offering smaller and more flexible tools, allowing enhanced applications on pediatric patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1827 / 1833
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Pediatric Robot-assisted Redo Pyeloplasty With Buccal Mucosa Graft: A Novel Technique [J].
Ahn, Jennifer J. ;
Shapiro, Michael E. ;
Ellison, Jonathan S. ;
Lendvay, Thomas S. .
UROLOGY, 2017, 101 :56-59
[2]   Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty among children: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Alhazmi, Hamdan Hammad .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2018, 10 (04) :347-353
[3]  
ANDERSON J C, 1949, Br J Urol, V21, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1949.tb10773.x
[4]   Mastering Robotic Surgery: Where Does the Learning Curve Lead Us? [J].
Andolfi, Ciro ;
Umanskiy, Konstantin .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (05) :470-474
[5]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Long-term outcome [J].
Ansari, Mohd S. ;
Mandhani, Anil ;
Singh, Partipal ;
Srivastava, Aneesh ;
Kumar, Anant ;
Kapoor, Rakesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) :881-884
[6]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants [J].
Avery, Daniel I. ;
Herbst, Katherine W. ;
Lendvay, Thomas S. ;
Noh, Paul H. ;
Dangle, Pankaj ;
Gundeti, Mohan S. ;
Steele, Matthew C. ;
Corbett, Sean T. ;
Peters, Craig A. ;
Kim, Christina .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2015, 11 (03) :139.e1-139.e5
[7]   Infant robotic pyeloplasty: Comparison with an open cohort [J].
Bansal, D. ;
Cost, N. G. ;
DeFoor, W. R., Jr. ;
Reddy, P. P. ;
Minevich, E. A. ;
Vanderbrink, B. A. ;
Alam, S. ;
Sheldon, C. A. ;
Noh, P. H. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2014, 10 (02) :380-385
[8]   Validated cost comparison of open vs. robotic pyeloplasty in American children’s hospitals [J].
Bennett W.E., Jr. ;
Whittam B.M. ;
Szymanski K.M. ;
Rink R.C. ;
Cain M.P. ;
Carroll A.E. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (2) :201-206
[9]   Failed pyeloplasty in children: Comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty [J].
Braga, Luis H. P. ;
Lorenzo, Armando J. ;
Skeldon, Sean ;
Dave, Sumit ;
Bagli, Darius J. ;
Khoury, Antoine E. ;
Salle, Joao L. Pippi ;
Farhat, Walid A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06) :2571-2575
[10]   Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years [J].
Cascio, S. ;
Tien, A. ;
Chee, W. ;
Tan, H. L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) :335-338