Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production

被引:375
作者
Kirkegaard, John [1 ]
Christen, Olaf [2 ]
Krupinsky, Joseph [3 ]
Layzell, David [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Plant Ind, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Agron & Crop Sci, D-06099 Halle, Germany
[3] USDA ARS, Mandan, ND 58554 USA
[4] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
disease; structure; soil biology; sequence; rotation; preceding crop;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2008.02.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Changes in the sequence of crops grown on agricultural land are well known to enhance the yield of grain crops such as wheat. A survey of the literature gathered from around the world show mean yield benefits of up to 20% or more. Much is known about the principal mechanisms responsible for these benefits, including effects on disease control, improved nitrogen nutrition and water supply, although researchers continue to be challenged by inexplicable "rotation effects" that have yet to be documented or fully understood. This review summarizes our current understanding of the 'better-known' mechanisms of crop rotation, and discusses other mechanisms (e.g. changes in rhizosphere biology, allelopathy or soil structure) that may help to account fully for the rotation benefits that have been observed by agricultural producers for more than 2000 years. Where possible we emphasise new techniques employed to investigate these less well-understood aspects of the "rotation effect". At the farm level, the inability to capitalize on the benefits of break crops may owe more to economics, the availability of suitable break crops and the complexity of the crop response. Computer-based decision support tools have been developed to assist growers to apply the information gathered from scientific studies, although efforts to integrate this information at whole-farm scales are embryonic. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 195
页数:11
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   BIOFUMIGATION - ISOTHIOCYANATES RELEASED FROM BRASSICA ROOTS INHIBIT GROWTH OF THE TAKE-ALL FUNGUS [J].
ANGUS, JF ;
GARDNER, PA ;
KIRKEGAARD, JA ;
DESMARCHELIER, JM .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1994, 162 (01) :107-112
[2]   PRODUCTIVITY AND BREAK CROP EFFECTS OF WINTER-GROWING OILSEEDS [J].
ANGUS, JF ;
VANHERWAARDEN, AF ;
HOWE, GN .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1991, 31 (05) :669-677
[3]  
Angus JF, 2001, P 10 AUSTR AGR C
[4]  
ARP DJ, 1992, BIOL NITROGEN FIXATI, P432
[5]   Modified no-till and crop sequence effects on spring wheat production in northern Alberta, Canada [J].
Arshad, MA ;
Soon, YK ;
Azooz, RH .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2002, 65 (01) :29-36
[6]   Effect of tillage and crop rotation on root and foliar diseases of wheat and pea in Saskatchewan from 1991 to 1998: Univariate and multivariate analyses [J].
Bailey, KL ;
Gossen, BD ;
Lafond, GR ;
Watson, PR ;
Derksen, DA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (04) :789-803
[7]   Impact of agronomic practices and environment on diseases of wheat and lentil in southeastern Saskatchewan [J].
Bailey, KL ;
Gossen, BD ;
Derksen, DA ;
Watson, PR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (04) :917-927
[8]   Comparison between test and analysis of a tank bulkhead loaded in the plastic range [J].
Becker, W ;
Wacker, T .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 1 (01) :77-81
[9]   Nitrogen contribution of field pea in annual cropping systems .2. Total nitrogen benefit [J].
Beckie, HJ ;
Brandt, SA ;
Schoenau, JJ ;
Campbell, CA ;
Henry, JL ;
Janzen, HH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1997, 77 (03) :323-331
[10]   Influence of previous crop type on yield of spring wheat: Analysis of commercial field data [J].
Bourgeois, L ;
Entz, MH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (03) :457-459