How to implement magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in clinical practice: nomograms for saving biopsies

被引:8
作者
Borque-Fernando, Angel [1 ]
Mariano Esteban, Luis [2 ]
Celma, Ana [3 ]
Roche, Sarai [4 ]
Planas, Jacques [3 ]
Regis, Lucas [3 ]
de Torres, Ines [5 ,6 ]
Eugenia Semidey, Maria [5 ]
Trilla, Enrique [3 ,6 ]
Morote, Juan [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] IIS Aragon, Dept Urol, Hosp Univ Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Escuela Univ Politecn La Almunia, Dept Appl Math, C Mayor 5, La Almunia De Dona Godin 50100, Saragossa, Spain
[3] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Dept Radiol, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Valle De Hebron, Dept Pathol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparemetric resonance imaging; PI-RADS; Nomograms; CANCER RISK; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; PREDICTION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-019-02946-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To combine multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) findings and clinical parameters to provide nomograms for diagnosing different scenarios of aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods A cohort of 346 patients with suspicion of PCa because of abnormal finding in digital rectal examination (DRE) and/or high prostate specific antigen (PSA) level received mpMRI prior to prostate biopsy (PBx). A conventional 12-core transrectal PBx with two extra cores from suspicious areas in mpMRI was performed by cognitive fusion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed combining age, PSA density (PSAD), DRE, number of previous PBx, and mpMRI findings to predict three different scenarios: PCa, significant PCa (ISUP-group >= 2), or aggressive PCa (ISUP-group >= 3). We validate models by ROC curves, calibration plots, probability density functions (PDF), and clinical utility curves (CUC). Cut-off probabilities were estimated for helping decision-making in clinical practice. Results Our cohort showed 39.6% incidence of PCa, 32.6% of significant PCa, and 23.4% of aggressive PCa. The AUC of predictive models were 0.856, 0.883, and 0.911, respectively. The PDF and CUC showed 11% missed diagnoses of significant PCa (35 cases of 326 significant PCa expected in 1000 proposed Bx) when choosing < 18% as the cutoff of probability for not performing PBx; the percentage of saved PBx was 47% (474 avoided PBx in 1000 proposed). Conclusion We developed clinical and mpMRI-based nomograms with a high discrimination ability for three different scenarios of PCa aggressiveness (). Specific clinical cutoff points allow us to save a high number of PBx with a minimum of missed diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1491
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Chiu, Peter K.
    Osses, Daniel F.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Albers, Peter
    Arsov, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) : 310 - 318
  • [2] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [3] Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Sarkar, Saradwata
    Lepor, Herbert
    Huang, William C.
    Huang, Richard
    Venkataraman, Rajesh
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 112 : 112 - 119
  • [4] Implementing the use of nomograms by choosing threshold points in predictive models: 2012 updated Partin Tables vs a European predictive nomogram for organ-confined disease in prostate cancer
    Borque, Angel
    Rubio-Briones, Jose
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Sanz, Gerardo
    Dominguez-Escrig, Jose
    Ramirez-Backhaus, Miguel
    Calatrava, Ana
    Solsona, Eduardo
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (06) : 878 - 886
  • [5] A Preliminary Study of the Ability of the 4Kscore test, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial-Risk Calculator and the European Research Screening Prostate-Risk Calculator for Predicting High-Grade Prostate Cancer
    Borque-Fernando, A.
    Esteban-Escano, L. M.
    Rubio-Briones, J.
    Lou-Mercade, A. C.
    Garcia-Ruiz, R.
    Tejero-Sanchez, A.
    Munoz-Rivero, M. V.
    Cabanuz-Plo, T.
    Alfaro-Torres, J.
    Marquina-Ibanez, I. M.
    Hakim-Alonso, S.
    Mejia-Urbaez, E.
    Gil-Fabra, J.
    Gil-Martinez, P.
    Avarez-Alegret, R.
    Sanz, G.
    Gil-Sanz, M. J.
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (03): : 155 - 163
  • [6] BORQUEFERNANDO A, 2019, WHO PREDICTIVE MODEL
  • [7] Carroll P.R., 2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Prostate Cancer Early Detection
  • [8] Prostate Cancer Gene 3 (PCA3): Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Biopsy Nomogram
    Chun, Felix K.
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    van Poppel, Hendrik
    Marberger, Michael
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Mulders, Peter F. A.
    Huland, Hartwig
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    Stillebroer, Alexander B.
    van Gils, Martijn P. M. Q.
    Schalken, Jack A.
    Fradet, Yves
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Ellis, William
    Partin, Alan W.
    Haese, Alexander
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (04) : 659 - 667
  • [9] PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naive patient population
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Rusconi, Giovanni
    Petretta, Mario
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Fusco, Ferdinando
    Longo, Nicola
    Persico, Francesco
    Cocozza, Sirio
    Brunetti, Arturo
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 104 : 64 - 70
  • [10] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435