SINDy-SA framework: enhancing nonlinear system identification with sensitivity analysis

被引:23
|
作者
Naozuka, Gustavo T. [1 ]
Rocha, Heber L. [2 ]
Silva, Renato S. [1 ]
Almeida, Regina C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lab Nacl Comp Cient, Petropolis, RJ, Brazil
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Intelligent Syst Engn, Bloomington, IN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Sparse identification; Sensitivity analysis; Model selection; Differential equations; Data-driven methods; SPARSE IDENTIFICATION; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11071-022-07755-2
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Machine learning methods have revolutionized studies in several areas of knowledge, helping to understand and extract information from experimental data. Recently, these data-driven methods have also been used to discover structures of mathematical models. The sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) method has been proposed with the aim of identifying nonlinear dynamical systems, assuming that the equations have only a few important terms that govern the dynamics. By defining a library of possible terms, the SINDy approach solves a sparse regression problem by eliminating terms whose coefficients are smaller than a threshold. However, the choice of this threshold is decisive for the correct identification of the model structure. In this work, we build on the SINDy method by integrating it with a global sensitivity analysis (SA) technique that allows to hierarchize terms according to their importance in relation to the desired quantity of interest, thus circumventing the need to define the SINDy threshold. The proposed SINDy-SA framework also includes the formulation of different experimental settings, recalibration of each identified model, and the use of model selection techniques to select the best and most parsimonious model. We investigate the use of the proposed SINDy-SA framework in a variety of applications. We also compare the results against the original SINDy method. The results demonstrate that the SINDy-SA framework is a promising methodology to accurately identify interpretable data-driven models.
引用
收藏
页码:2589 / 2609
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] SINDy-SA framework: enhancing nonlinear system identification with sensitivity analysis
    Gustavo T. Naozuka
    Heber L. Rocha
    Renato S. Silva
    Regina C. Almeida
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 110 : 2589 - 2609
  • [2] Sensitivity Analysis of Kernel Estimates: Implications in Nonlinear Physiological System Identification
    David T. Westwick
    Béla Suki
    Kenneth R. Lutchen
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1998, 26 : 488 - 501
  • [3] System identification of nonlinear mechanical systems using embedded sensitivity functions
    Yang, CH
    Adams, DE
    Ciray, S
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (06): : 530 - 541
  • [4] NONLINEAR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FOR EXPLAINING POPULATION-DYNAMICS IN A LIFE-SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK
    SHAROV, AA
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 1995, 13 (02) : 103 - 113
  • [5] Identification of Photovoltaic Power System Based on Sensitivity Analysis
    Qu Li-nan
    Zhu Ling-zhi
    Shi Tao
    Liu Jing
    2013 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2013,
  • [6] Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification for a nonlinear time-delay system in microbial fed-batch process
    Liu, Chongyang
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2014, 38 (04) : 1449 - 1463
  • [7] Nonlinear breathing crack identification from time-domain sensitivity analysis
    Lu, Zhong-Rong
    Yang, Dahao
    Liu, Jike
    Wang, Li
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2020, 83 : 30 - 45
  • [8] A framework for sensitivity analysis of data errors on home energy management system
    Choi, Dae-Hyun
    Xie, Le
    ENERGY, 2016, 117 : 166 - 175
  • [9] Identification and sensitivity analysis of a correlated ground rule system (design arc)
    Eastman, Eric
    Chidambarrao, Dureseti
    Rausch, Werner
    Topaloglu, Rasit O.
    Shao, Dongbing
    Ramachandran, Ravikumar
    Angyal, Matthew
    DESIGN-PROCESS-TECHNOLOGY CO-OPTIMIZATION FOR MANUFACTURABILITY XI, 2017, 10148