Concepts of politics in securitization studies

被引:58
作者
Gad, Ulrik Pram [1 ]
Petersen, Karen Lund [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Adv Secur Theory, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Copenhagen School; critical theory; securitization theory; conceptual history; concept of politics; COPENHAGEN SCHOOL; SECURITY; TERRORISM; RISK; CONSTRUCTION; IDENTITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/0967010611418716
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The article argues that there are a number of concepts of politics in play in the current debates on securitization theory and that greater awareness regarding these conceptual differences helps clarify not only theoretical differences but also the possibilities for new theoretical development and reflection. The article identifies three conversations on politics: first, a conversation on how politics concerns action and intentionality; second, a conversation on the modern organization of politics, spheres and sectors; and, third, a conversation on the relationship between politics, ethics and science. Where the first and third conversations refer to politics as an act, in the second conversation politics is inherently tied to the institutional or spatial structures of government - the state, the public, the political field, spheres, sectors or function.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 328
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation [J].
Albert, Mathias ;
Buzan, Barry .
SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2011, 42 (4-5) :413-425
[2]  
Albert Mathias, 1998, INT J PEACE STUDIES, V3, P23
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SECURITY PRACTICE DI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, WRITING SECURITY US
[5]  
[Anonymous], H MORGENTHAU REALISM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, RISK SOC WAR TERROR
[7]  
[Anonymous], DISTINKTION
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Working paper 19
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The politics of protection. sites of insecurity
[10]  
[Anonymous], REV INT STUDIES