A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision

被引:123
|
作者
Goff, Rebecca R. [1 ]
Uccellini, Kimberly [1 ]
Lindblad, Kelsi [1 ]
Hall, Shelley [2 ]
Davies, Ryan [3 ]
Farr, Maryjane [4 ]
Silvestry, Scott [5 ]
Rogers, Joseph G. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Childrens Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Advent Hlth Transplant Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
clinical research; practice; health services and outcomes research; heart disease; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); patient survival; statistics; UNITED NETWORK; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.16010
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) modified adult heart allocation to better stratify candidates and provide broader access to the most medically urgent candidates. We analyzed OPTN data that included waiting list and transplant characteristics, geographical distribution, and early outcomes 1 year before (pre: October 18, 2017-October 17, 2018) and following (post: October 18, 2018-October 17, 2019) implementation. The number of adult heart transplants increased from 2954 pre- to 3032 postimplementation. Seventy-eight percent of transplants in the post era were for the most medically urgent (statuses 1-3) compared to 68% for status 1A in the pre era. The median distance between the donor hospital and transplant center increased from 83 to 216 nautical miles, with an increase in total ischemic time from 3 to 3.4 hours (allP < .001). Waiting list mortality was not different across eras (14.8 vs 14.9 deaths per 100 patient-years pre vs post respectively). Posttransplant patient survival was not different, 93.6% pre and 92.8% post. There is early evidence that the heart allocation policy has enhanced stratification of candidates by their medical urgency and broader distribution for the most medically urgent candidates with minimal impact on overall waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2781 / 2790
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of the 2016 revision of US pediatric heart allocation policy on waitlist characteristics and outcomes
    Magnetta, Defne A.
    Godown, Justin
    West, Shawn
    Zinn, Matthew
    Rose-Felker, Kirsten
    Miller, Susan
    Feingold, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (12) : 3276 - 3283
  • [2] Report From a Forum on US Heart Allocation Policy
    Kobashigawa, J. A.
    Johnson, M.
    Rogers, J.
    Vega, J. D.
    Colvin-Adams, M.
    Edwards, L.
    Meyer, D.
    Luu, M.
    Reinsmoen, N.
    Dipchand, A. I.
    Feldman, D.
    Kormos, R.
    Mancini, D.
    Webber, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [3] New French heart allocation system: Comparison with Eurotransplant and US allocation systems
    Dorent, Richard
    Jasseron, Carine
    Audry, Benoit
    Bayer, Florian
    Legeai, Camille
    Cantrelle, Christelle
    Smits, Jacqueline M.
    Eisen, Howard
    Jacquelinet, Christian
    Leprince, Pascal
    Bastien, Olivier
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (05) : 1236 - 1243
  • [4] A national assessment of one-year heart outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation change
    Bradbrook, Keighly
    Goff, Rebecca R.
    Lindblad, Kelsi
    Daly, Richard C.
    Hall, Shelley
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (02) : 196 - 205
  • [5] The Future Direction of the Adult Heart Allocation System in the United States
    Meyer, D. M.
    Rogers, J. G.
    Edwards, L. B.
    Callahan, E. R.
    Webber, S. A.
    Johnson, M. R.
    Vega, J. D.
    Zucker, M. J.
    Cleveland, J. C., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (01) : 44 - 54
  • [6] The 2018 adult heart allocation policy change benefits low-volume transplant centers
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Tran, Zachary
    Xia, Yu
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Williamson, Catherine G.
    Gandjian, Matthew
    Choi, Chun Woo
    Benharash, Peyman
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 35 (08)
  • [7] Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Bridging to Heart Transplantation Impact of the 2018 Allocation Change
    Huckaby, Lauren V.
    Seese, Laura M.
    Mathier, Michael A.
    Hickey, Gavin W.
    Kilic, Arman
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (08) : E006971
  • [8] Donor and Recipient Age Influence Outcomes Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in the 2018 US Heart Allocation System
    Iyanna, Nidhi
    Hong, Yeahwa
    Hess, Nicholas R.
    Ziegler, Luke A.
    Dorken-Gallastegi, Ander
    Hickey, Gavin W.
    Keebler, Mary E.
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2025, 109 (03) : 549 - 557
  • [9] Heart Transplant Allocation In Desperate Need of Revision
    Mancini, Donna M.
    Schulze, P. Christian
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : 1179 - 1181
  • [10] Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the 2018 adult heart allocation policy
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Xia, Yu
    Tran, Zachary
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Dobaria, Vishal
    Choi, Chun Woo
    Benharash, Peyman
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):