A novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality, between and within different x-ray units in a series of hospitals

被引:7
作者
Al-Murshedi, Sadeq [1 ]
Hogg, Peter [1 ]
Lanca, Luis [2 ,3 ,4 ]
England, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
[2] Singapore Inst Technol Hlth & Social Sci Cluster, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Lisbon Sch Hlth Technol, P-1990096 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Karolinska Inst, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
image quality; radiation dose; dose optimisation; adult chest radiography; CDRAD; 2.0; phantom; DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY; FLAT-PANEL; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; AMORPHOUS-SILICON; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS; DETECTOR; RADIOLOGY; MAMMOGRAPHY; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/aae3fa
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Objectives: To develop a novel method for comparing radiation dose and image quality (IQ) to evaluate adult chest x-ray (CXR) imaging among several hospitals. Methods: CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire images in eight hospitals (17 digital x-ray units) using local adult CXR protocols. IQ was represented by image quality figure inverse (IQF(inv)), measured using CDRAD analyser software. Signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio and conspicuity index were calculated as additional measures of IQ. Incident air kerma (IAK) was measured using a solid-state dosimeter for each acquisition. Figure of merit (FOM) was calculated to provide a single estimation of IQ and radiation dose. Results: IQ, radiation dose and FOM varied considerably between hospitals and x-ray units. For IQF(inv), the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 1.42 (0.83-2.18) and 1.87 (1.52-2.18), respectively. For IAK, the mean (range) between and within the hospitals were 93.56 (17.26-239.15) mu Gy and 180.85 (122.58-239.15) mu Gy, respectively. For FOM, the mean (range) between and within hospitals were 0.05 (0.01-0.14) and 0.03 (0.02-0.05), respectively. Conclusions: The suggested method for comparing IQ and dose using FOM concept along with the new proposed FOM, is a valid, reliable and effective approach for monitoring and comparing IQ and dose between and within hospitals. It is also can be beneficial for the optimisation of x-ray units in clinical practice. Further optimisation for the hospitals/x-ray units with low FOM are required to minimise radiation dose without degrading IQ.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1358
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography [J].
Al-Murshedi, Sadeq ;
Hogg, Peter ;
England, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1089)
[2]  
Almen A, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P337
[3]   Optimisation of computed radiography systems for chest imaging [J].
Alzimami, K. ;
Sassi, S. ;
Alkhorayef, M. ;
Britten, A. J. ;
Spyrou, N. M. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2009, 600 (02) :513-518
[4]   Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography [J].
Bacher, K ;
Smeets, P ;
De Hauwere, A ;
Verstraete, K ;
Thierens, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) :923-929
[5]   Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications [J].
Bath, Magnus .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) :26-36
[6]   A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency [J].
Bertolini, Marco ;
Nitrosi, Andrea ;
Rivetti, Stefano ;
Lanconelli, Nico ;
Pattacini, Pierpaolo ;
Ginocchi, Vladimiro ;
Iori, Mauro .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) :2617-2627
[7]   The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimisation in digital mammography: a literature review [J].
Borg, M. ;
Badr, I. ;
Royle, G. J. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 151 (01) :81-88
[8]   Exploration of exposure conditions with a novel wireless detector for bedside digital radiography [J].
Bosmans, Hilde ;
Nens, Joris ;
Delzenne, Louis ;
Marshall, Nicholas ;
Pauwels, Herman ;
De Wever, Walter ;
Oyen, Raymond .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
[9]   Correlation of Contrast-Detail Analysis and Clinical Image Quality Assessment in Chest Radiography with a Human Cadaver Study [J].
De Crop, An ;
Bacher, Klaus ;
Van Hoof, Tom ;
Smeets, Peter V. ;
Smet, Barbara S. ;
Vergauwen, Merel ;
Kiendys, Urszula ;
Duyck, Philippe ;
Verstraete, Koenraad ;
D'Herde, Katharina ;
Thierens, Hubert .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (01) :298-304
[10]   Evaluation of the contrast-detail response of a cardiovascular angiography system and the influence of the equipment variables on image quality [J].
Dragusin, Octavian ;
Smans, Kristien ;
Jacobs, Jurgen ;
Inal, Tolga ;
Bosmans, Hilde .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913