An exploratory analysis of Brazilian universities in the technological innovation process

被引:7
作者
Andrade, Eron Passos [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Jadiel dos Santos [1 ]
Rocha, Angela Machado [2 ,3 ]
Nascimento, Marcio Luis Ferreira [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Energy & Sustainabil Sci & Technol Ctr, CETENS, Rua Godofredo Rebello Figueiredo Filho, 697, SIM, BR-44085132 Feira De Santana, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Grad Program Ind Engn, PEI, Rua Aristides Novis, 2, Federacao, BR-40210630 Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Bahia, Campus Univ Ondina, ProfNIT Grad Program Intellectual Property & Techn, Rua Barao Jeremoabo, 147, BR-40170115 Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Technological innovation; Intellectual property; Universities; Principal component analysis; Similarity; Hierarchical clustering; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121876
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to use hierarchical clustering (HC) and principal component analysis (PCA) for determining the key institutions and variables in a multidimensional data set to visualize Triple Helix (TH) re-lationships between industry, academia and government. This is a huge task, essential to better understand technological innovation, an interactive process that creates knowledge in an integrated way, reducing the number of variables. For this task we analyzed the data from eight Brazilian universities between 2008 and 2015 considering median of twelve parameters so diverse as the number of research groups; researchers; teaching staff; innovation projects in collaboration; papers; patents; technology transfer agreement; money generated from technology transfer and financing. From HC it was possible to identify four main university clusters considering all variables. PCA also shown four groups on main component mapping, in agreement with HC. The financing, the existence of innovation environments and specific innovation legislation, and the regional context explain clustering. PCA suggests that much of the data variability can be summarized in three principal components, presenting industry, academia and government interrelationships, in agreement with HC. So PCA and HC could be considered as a new view of investigation to quantify the TH, statistically mapping this model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[11]  
CAPES-Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, 2019, GEOR INF SYST
[12]  
Carayannis Elias G., 2010, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, V1, P41, DOI 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
[13]   Managing the intellectual capital within government-university-industry R&D partnerships A framework for the engineering research centers [J].
Carayannis, Elias ;
Del Giudice, Manlio ;
Della Peruta, Maria Rosaria .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2014, 15 (04) :611-+
[14]  
CASTRO B. S. de, 2012, Liinc em Revista, V8, P125, DOI [10.18617/liinc.v8i1.465, DOI 10.18617/LIINC.V8I1.465]
[15]  
CNPq-National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, 2019, TAB PLAN
[16]   A Taxonomy of Public Research Bodies: A Systemic Approach(1) [J].
Coccia, Mario .
PROMETHEUS, 2005, 23 (01) :63-82
[17]  
Cross D., 2017, Research in Brazil - A report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics
[18]   New perspectives on university-industry relations: an analysis of the knowledge flow within two sectors and two countries [J].
Dalmarco, Gustavo ;
Hulsink, Willem ;
Zawislak, Paulo A. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2019, 31 (11) :1314-1326
[19]  
Del Giudice M., 2008, IMPRESA PENSANTE
[20]  
Del Giudice M, 2012, INNOV TECH KNOWL MAN, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2089-7_5