An exploratory analysis of Brazilian universities in the technological innovation process

被引:7
作者
Andrade, Eron Passos [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Jadiel dos Santos [1 ]
Rocha, Angela Machado [2 ,3 ]
Nascimento, Marcio Luis Ferreira [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Reconcavo Bahia, Energy & Sustainabil Sci & Technol Ctr, CETENS, Rua Godofredo Rebello Figueiredo Filho, 697, SIM, BR-44085132 Feira De Santana, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Grad Program Ind Engn, PEI, Rua Aristides Novis, 2, Federacao, BR-40210630 Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Bahia, Campus Univ Ondina, ProfNIT Grad Program Intellectual Property & Techn, Rua Barao Jeremoabo, 147, BR-40170115 Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Technological innovation; Intellectual property; Universities; Principal component analysis; Similarity; Hierarchical clustering; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121876
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to use hierarchical clustering (HC) and principal component analysis (PCA) for determining the key institutions and variables in a multidimensional data set to visualize Triple Helix (TH) re-lationships between industry, academia and government. This is a huge task, essential to better understand technological innovation, an interactive process that creates knowledge in an integrated way, reducing the number of variables. For this task we analyzed the data from eight Brazilian universities between 2008 and 2015 considering median of twelve parameters so diverse as the number of research groups; researchers; teaching staff; innovation projects in collaboration; papers; patents; technology transfer agreement; money generated from technology transfer and financing. From HC it was possible to identify four main university clusters considering all variables. PCA also shown four groups on main component mapping, in agreement with HC. The financing, the existence of innovation environments and specific innovation legislation, and the regional context explain clustering. PCA suggests that much of the data variability can be summarized in three principal components, presenting industry, academia and government interrelationships, in agreement with HC. So PCA and HC could be considered as a new view of investigation to quantify the TH, statistically mapping this model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Institutionalized resistance to organizational change: Denial, inaction and repression [J].
Agocs, C .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1997, 16 (09) :917-931
[2]   A new comparative model for national innovation systems based on machine learning classification techniques [J].
Alnafrah, Ibrahim ;
Zeno, Bassel .
INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (01) :45-66
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, San Fran- sisco, DOI DOI 10.2307/1217562
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The KnowledgeCreating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Springer Texts in Statistics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, National Systems of innovation: A comparative study
[7]   Interorganizational knowledge sharing in a science and technology park: the use of knowledge sharing mechanisms [J].
Balle, Andrea Raymundo ;
Steffen, Mario Oscar ;
Curado, Carla ;
Oliveira, Mirian .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 23 (10) :2016-2038
[8]   Cooperation and technological areas in the state universities of Sao Paulo: An analysis from the perspective of the triple helix model [J].
Basso, Fernanda Gisele ;
Pereira, Cristiano Gonsalves ;
Porto, Geciane Silveira .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 65
[9]  
Bikse V., 2016, Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, V18, P75, DOI [DOI 10.1515/JTES, 10.1515/jtes-2016-0016, DOI 10.1515/JTES-2016-0016]
[10]   Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers [J].
Boardman, P. Craig .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (10) :1505-1516