Hypermobile upper lip is highly prevalent among patients seeking treatment for gummy smile

被引:31
作者
Andijan, Reem, I [1 ,2 ]
Tatakis, Dimitris N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Dent, Div Periodontol, 305 West 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] King Fahad Med City, Dent Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
esthetics; dental; gingiva; lip; smiling; EXCESSIVE GINGIVAL DISPLAY; ALTERED PASSIVE ERUPTION; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS; AESTHETICS; DIAGNOSIS; CYCLOSPORINE; OVERGROWTH; MANAGEMENT; DENTITION; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/JPER.18-0468
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Excessive gingival display (EGD), or a gummy smile (GS), is a mucogingival deformity that can be of concern to patients. The prevalence of GS etiologies, such as altered passive eruption (APE) and hypermobile upper lip (HUL), has not been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of APE and HUL in patients seeking to correct their GS, and to determine possible prevalence differences among patients with different gingival display (GD) levels. Methods During clinical screening of patients interested in participating in a GS treatment study, GD diagnosis, GD level, and presence of APE and/or HUL were determined. Descriptive statistics were calculated for APE, HUL, and GD group prevalence. Fisher's exact test was used to determine difference in frequency of etiologies between GD groups. Results Fifty-six patients were clinically screened (27.2 +/- 7.2 years old; 85.7% females; 94.6% with GD, 5.4% without GD). Among patients having GD, 75.5% presented with GD >= 4 mm and 24.5% with GD<4 mm. Prevalence of etiologies was: 20.8% APE alone, 45.3% HUL alone, and 34% APE and HUL. The prevalence difference between GD >= 4 mm and GD<4 mm groups was statistically significant (p<0.0001); for >= 4 mm GD: 5% presented with APE alone, 50% HUL alone, and 45% APE and HUL; for Conclusion Among patients seeking GS treatment, HUL is the most predominant etiology and it is often present in combination with APE.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 262
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Ahmad I, 2017, INT J ESTHET DENT, V12, P352
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, ASA Physical Status Classification System
  • [4] Impact of excessive gingival display on oral health-related quality of life in a Southern Brazilian young population
    Antoniazzi, Raquel P.
    Fischer, Luana de S.
    Balbinot, Carlos Eduardo A.
    Antoniazzi, Simone P.
    Skupien, Jovito A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (10) : 996 - 1002
  • [5] Upper lip asymmetry in adults during smiling
    Benson, KJ
    Laskin, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (04) : 396 - 398
  • [6] LipStaT: The Lip Stabilization Technique-Indications and Guidelines for Case Selection and Classification of Excessive Gingival Display
    Bhola, Monish
    Fairbairn, Peter J. M.
    Kolhatkar, Shilpa
    Chu, Stephen J.
    Morris, Tamaara
    de Campos, Marinele
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 35 (04) : 549 - 559
  • [7] A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years
    Blanchette, ME
    Nanda, RS
    Currier, GF
    Ghosh, J
    Nanda, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 109 (02) : 116 - 131
  • [8] Boeck Eloísa Marcantonio, 2011, Braz. Dent. J., V22, P340
  • [9] BOKENKAMP A, 1994, PEDIATR NEPHROL, V8, P181
  • [10] Prevalence and risk of gingival enlargement in patients treated with anticonvulsant drugs
    Brunet, L
    Miranda, J
    Roset, R
    Berini, L
    Farré, M
    Mendieta, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2001, 31 (09) : 781 - 788