Mapping Grasslands in Mixed Grassland Ecoregion of Saskatchewan Using Big Remote Sensing Data and Machine Learning

被引:24
作者
Badreldin, Nasem [1 ]
Prieto, Beatriz [2 ]
Fisher, Ryan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Soil Sci, 13 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Saskatchewan Minist Environm, Fish Wildlife & Lands Branch, Habitat Unit, 3211 Albert St, Regina, SK S4S 5W6, Canada
[3] Royal Saskatchewan Museum, 2340 Albert St, Regina, SK S4P 2V7, Canada
关键词
grassland; remote sensing; machine learning; mixed grassland ecoregion; big data; DIFFERENCE WATER INDEX; LEAF-AREA INDEX; VEGETATION INDEX; RANDOM FOREST; HABITAT LOSS; CLASSIFICATION; REFLECTANCE; VALIDATION; PRODUCTS; PRAIRIE;
D O I
10.3390/rs13244972
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate spatial distribution information of native, mixed, and tame grasslands is essential for maintaining ecosystem health in the Prairie. This research aimed to use the latest monitoring technology to assess the remaining grasslands in Saskatchewan's mixed grassland ecoregion (MGE). The classification approach was based on 78 raster-based variables derived from big remote sensing data of multispectral optical space-borne sensors such as MODIS and Sentinel-2, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) space-borne sensors such as Sentinel-1. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used as a data dimensionality reduction technique to mitigate big data load and improve processing time. Random Forest (RF) was used in the classification process and incorporated the selected variables from 78 satellite-based layers and 2385 reference training points. Within the MGE, the overall accuracy of the classification was 90.2%. Native grassland had 98.20% of user's accuracy and 88.40% producer's accuracy, tame grassland had 81.4% user's accuracy and 93.8% producer's accuracy, whereas mixed grassland class had very low user's accuracy (45.8%) and producer's accuracy 82.83%. Approximately 3.46 million hectares (40.2%) of the MGE area are grasslands (33.9% native, 4% mixed, and 2.3% tame). This study establishes a novel analytical framework for reliable grassland mapping using big data, identifies future challenges, and provides valuable information for Saskatchewan and North America decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
[21]   Remote sensing of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, and total carotenoid content in eucalyptus leaves [J].
Datt, B .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 66 (02) :111-121
[22]   Remote sensing of water content in Eucalyptus leaves [J].
Datt, B .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1999, 47 (06) :909-923
[23]   Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance [J].
Daughtry, CST ;
Walthall, CL ;
Kim, MS ;
de Colstoun, EB ;
McMurtrey, JE .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 74 (02) :229-239
[24]   Atmospheric correction of Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2/MSI data using iCOR algorithm: validation for coastal and inland waters [J].
De Keukelaere, L. ;
Sterckx, S. ;
Adriaensen, S. ;
Knaeps, E. ;
Reusen, I ;
Giardino, C. ;
Bresciani, M. ;
Hunter, P. ;
Neil, C. ;
Van der Zande, D. ;
Vaiciute, D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 51 (01) :525-542
[25]  
De'ath G, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P3178, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO
[26]  
2
[27]  
Didan K., 2015, NASA EOSDIS LAND PRO, V10, DOI [10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006, DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006, 10.5067/MODIS/MOD13A3.006]
[28]  
Didan K., 2015, Vegetation index and phenology lab, V2015
[29]   Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services [J].
Drusch, M. ;
Del Bello, U. ;
Carlier, S. ;
Colin, O. ;
Fernandez, V. ;
Gascon, F. ;
Hoersch, B. ;
Isola, C. ;
Laberinti, P. ;
Martimort, P. ;
Meygret, A. ;
Spoto, F. ;
Sy, O. ;
Marchese, F. ;
Bargellini, P. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 120 :25-36
[30]   Crop yield estimation by satellite remote sensing [J].
Ferencz, C ;
Bognár, P ;
Lichtenberger, J ;
Hamar, D ;
Tarcsai, G ;
Timár, G ;
Molnár, G ;
Pásztor, S ;
Steinbach, P ;
Székely, B ;
Ferencz, OE ;
Ferencz-Arkos, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (20) :4113-4149