Government ideology and economic policy-making in the United States-a survey

被引:85
作者
Potrafke, Niklas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Econ, Schackstr 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[2] Ifo Ctr Publ Finance & Polit Econ, Ifo Inst, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
关键词
Government ideology; Economic policy-making; Partisan politics; United States; Democrats; Republicans; Political polarization; Causal effects; POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES; US MONETARY-POLICY; CONGRESSIONAL INFLUENCE; MACROECONOMIC POLICIES; MAYORAL PARTISANSHIP; SPENDING EVIDENCE; PARTY POLITICS; ELECT POLICIES; VOTERS AFFECT; LABOR-MARKET;
D O I
10.1007/s11127-017-0491-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper describes the influence of government ideology on economic policy-making in the United States. I review studies using data for the national, state and local levels and elaborate on checks and balances, especially divided government, measurement of government ideology and empirical strategies to identify causal effects. Many studies conclude that parties do matter in the United States. Democratic presidents generate, for example, higher rates of economic growth than Republican presidents, but these studies using data for the national level do not identify causal effects. Ideology-induced policies are prevalent at the state level: Democratic governors implement somewhat more expansionary and liberal policies than Republican governors. At the local level, government ideology hardly influences economic policy-making at all. How growing political polarization and demographic change will influence the effects of government ideology on economic policy-making will be an important issue for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 207
页数:63
相关论文
共 168 条
[51]   Partisan political business cycles in the German labour market? Empirical tests in the light of the Lucas-critique [J].
Belke, A .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2000, 104 (3-4) :225-283
[52]  
Belke A., 1996, Politische Konjunkturzyklen in Theorie und Empirie: Eine kritische Analyse der Zeitreihendynamik in Partisan-Ansatzen
[53]   Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies [J].
Bernecker, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2016, 142 :24-38
[54]   The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending [J].
Berry, Christopher R. ;
Burden, Barry C. ;
Howell, William G. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 104 (04) :783-799
[55]   Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93 [J].
Berry, WD ;
Ringquist, EJ ;
Fording, RC ;
Hanson, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (01) :327-348
[56]   DOES ELECTORAL ACCOUNTABILITY AFFECT ECONOMIC-POLICY CHOICES - EVIDENCE FROM GUBERNATORIAL TERM LIMITS [J].
BESLEY, T ;
CASE, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (03) :769-798
[57]   Political institutions and policy choices: Evidence from the United States [J].
Besley, T ;
Case, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2003, 41 (01) :7-73
[58]   Political Competition, Policy and Growth: Theory and Evidence from the US [J].
Besley, Timothy ;
Persson, Torsten ;
Sturm, Daniel M. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 77 (04) :1329-1352
[59]   The size and scope of government in the US states: does party ideology matter? [J].
Bjornskov, Christian ;
Potrafke, Niklas .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2013, 20 (04) :687-714
[60]   Presidents and the US Economy: An Econometric Exploration [J].
Blinder, Alan S. ;
Watson, Mark W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (04) :1015-1045