Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries

被引:19
作者
Janhom, A [1 ]
van Ginkel, FC [1 ]
van Amerongen, JP [1 ]
van der Stelt, PF [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Oral Radiol, ACTA, Dept Oral Radiol, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
digital radiography; dental; radiographic image enhancement; dental caries; observer variation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600604
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine a propel scanning resolution for digitizing bitewing radiographs in the detection of approximal caries, Methods: Fifty-two premolars and 48 molars were mounted in blocks and imaged on conventional film (Ektaspeed Plus, Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY USA) simulating a bitewing projection. The 15 bitewing radiographs were then scanned with a flatbed scanner at three resolutions 150, 300 and 600 d.p.i. The digitized images M:eri displayed in random order on a high-resolution cathode my tube monitor. Tell observers assessed the caries status of 200 approximal surfaces. They scored lesion presence on a 5-point confidence scale and depth on a 3-point scale. The observer's scores were compared with the results from a histological examination. Data were analysed using analysis of variance hv calculating signed observed error, absolute observer error and observer confidence. Results: Lesion depth had a significant effect on confidence of lesion recognition. The main effect of resolution and the intel action between resolution and lesion depth were significant. Pair-wise comparison showed a significant difference between resolutions in case of sound surfaces and surfaces with dentinal lesion for absolute error. The confidence increased as the resolution increased but no significant difference was found between 300 and 600 d.p.i. The best score for depth estimation was obtained at the 300 d.p.i. scanning resolution. Conclusions: When bitewing radiographs are scanned with a flatbed scanner, a resolution of 300 d.p.i, seems the best choice. At this resolution the digital file size is manageable without significant loss of the information necessary for caries diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 171
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Berry RF, 1998, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V49, P7
[2]   BITEWING-BASED ALVEOLAR BONE DENSITOMETRY - DIGITAL IMAGING RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS [J].
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
BARTLETT, TQ ;
BRUNSDEN, BS ;
HENTE, NL ;
GRAVIER, MJ ;
WALKUP, RK ;
SHROUT, MK ;
VANNIER, MW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (03) :129-134
[3]  
Jones DEA, 1949, BRIT J RADIOL, V22, P549, DOI [10.1259/0007-1285-22-261-549-b, DOI 10.1259/0007-1285-22-261-549-B]
[4]  
JONES DEA, 1948, BRIT J RADIOL, V22, P342
[5]   SPATIAL-RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS FOR DIGITIZING DENTAL RADIOGRAPHS [J].
KASSEBAUM, DK ;
MCDAVID, WD ;
DOVE, SB ;
WAGGENER, RG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1989, 67 (06) :760-769
[6]   EFFECT OF IMAGE MAGNIFICATION OF DIGITIZED BITEWING RADIOGRAPHS ON APPROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION - AN IN-VITRO STUDY [J].
MOYSTAD, A ;
SVANAES, DB ;
LARHEIM, TA ;
GRONDAHL, HG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (04) :255-259
[7]   FACTORS DETERMINING THE DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF DIGITIZED CONVENTIONAL INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHS [J].
OHKI, M ;
OKANO, T ;
NAKAMURA, T .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (02) :77-82
[8]   Teleradiology using low-cost consume-oriented computer hardware and software [J].
Pysher, L ;
Harlow, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (05) :1181-1184
[9]   35-MM FILM SCANNER AS AN INTRAORAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPH DIGITIZER .1. A QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION [J].
SHROUT, MK ;
POTTER, BJ ;
YURGALAVAGE, HM ;
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
VANNIER, MW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1993, 76 (04) :502-509
[10]   35-MM FILM SCANNER AS AN INTRAORAL DENTAL RADIOGRAPH DIGITIZER .2. EFFECTS OF BRIGHTNESS AND CONTRAST ADJUSTMENTS [J].
SHROUT, MK ;
POTTER, BJ ;
YURGALAVAGE, HM ;
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
VANNIER, MW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1993, 76 (04) :510-518