Models of interdependent individuals versus dyadic processes in relationship research

被引:50
作者
Iida, Masumi [1 ]
Seidman, Gwendolyn [2 ]
Shrout, Patrick E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, POB 873701, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Albright Coll, Reading, PA 19612 USA
[3] NYU, New York, NY USA
关键词
Actor-partner interdependence model; common fate model; dyadic data; dyadic score model; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS; SEXUAL SATISFACTION; SOCIAL-CONTROL; LEVEL DATA; PARTNER; ACTOR; MAINTENANCE; PERSONALITY; CONGRUENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0265407517725407
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In this article, we consider the statistical models that are appropriate to understand relationship processes between two people who are in a committed relationship. Some of these processes capture inherently individual processes where individuals happen to be interrelated and others capture inherently dyadic processes. We compare several different statistical approaches to model these phenomena, including the actor-partner interdependence model, common fate model, and a dyadic score model. We compare and contrast these models using a data set on closeness and time spent together from 201 couples where one partner is distinguished by stress associated with an upcoming professional exam. The models yield results that appear to give different interpretations of the data. We discuss situations in which each model may be preferred and invite relationship researchers to model relationship data using the statistical model that matches their conceptual framework, rather than using a rigid statistical methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 88
页数:30
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS
    ARON, A
    ARON, EN
    SMOLLAN, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) : 596 - 612
  • [2] Optimism: An enduring resource for romantic relationships
    Assad, Kimberly K.
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    Conger, Rand D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 93 (02) : 285 - 297
  • [3] Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness
    Back, Mitja D.
    Penke, Lars
    Schmukle, Stefan C.
    Sachse, Karoline
    Borkenau, Peter
    Asendorpf, Jens B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 25 (02) : 120 - 132
  • [4] How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    Demerouti, Evangelia
    Dollard, Maureen F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (04) : 901 - 911
  • [5] THE RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS INVENTORY - ASSESSING THE CLOSENESS OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
    BERSCHEID, E
    SNYDER, M
    OMOTO, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (05) : 792 - 807
  • [6] Berscheid E., 1983, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, P110
  • [7] BLOCK JH, 1981, CHILD DEV, V52, P965, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03138.x
  • [8] Bodenmann G., 2008, Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test Manual
  • [9] CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE
    BOLLEN, K
    LENNOX, R
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) : 305 - 314
  • [10] Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples
    Butzer, Bethany
    Campbell, Lorne
    [J]. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2008, 15 (01) : 141 - 154