A decrease in blood pressure following pyelolithotomy but not extracorporeal lithotripsy

被引:6
作者
Eterovic, D
Situm, M
Juretic-Kuscic, L
Dujic, Z
机构
[1] Sch Med, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Split 21000, Croatia
[2] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Urol, Split 21000, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Nucl Med, Split 21000, Croatia
来源
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH | 2005年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
nephrolithiasis; renal vascular resistance; shock waves; renal stone surgery; renal obstruction;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-004-0452-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Our aim was to evaluate the hypothesis that relief of renal obstruction lowers the arterial blood pressure if the procedure of stone removal does not injure the kidney itself. Sixty patients with unilateral renal stone were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after electrical shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL, n=30) or Gil-Vernet intrasinus pyelolithotomy (n=30). Blood pressures were measured noninvasively and renal vascular resistances were obtained from radionuclide measurements of renal blood flow. At baseline, the renal vascular resistance of the obstructed kidney was 2 and 2.5 times greater than of the unobstructed kidney in the ESWL and pyelolithotomy groups, respectively. After 3 months in operated patients, the blood pressure decreased (from 87 to 81 mm Hg, P=0.002, in case of diastolic, and from 140 to 132 mm Hg, P < 0.0001, in case of systolic pressure), while the vascular resistances of both kidneys were equal and normal. In contrast, in the ESWL group the blood pressures and vascular resistances of the treated kidney did not differ from the baseline values. Surgical relief of renal obstruction chronically lowers the arterial blood pressure, possibly by normalizing the renal vascular resistance. ESWL does not change the blood pressure or renal vascular resistance, which could reflect a balance between the relief of obstruction and kidney lesions induced by shock waves.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BLAUFOX MD, 1995, HYPERTENSION PATHOPH, P2030
[2]  
BOMANJI J, 1987, J NUCL MED, V28, P1284
[3]   Essential arterial hypertension and stone disease [J].
Borghi, L ;
Meschi, T ;
Guerra, A ;
Briganti, A ;
Schianchi, T ;
Allegri, F ;
Novarini, A .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 55 (06) :2397-2406
[5]   Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function [J].
Eterovic, D ;
Juretic-Kuscic, L ;
Capkun, V ;
Dujic, Z .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) :39-44
[6]   UNRECOGNIZED HIGH-PRESSURE CHRONIC RETENTION OF URINE PRESENTING WITH SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION [J].
GHOSE, RR ;
HARINDRA, V .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 298 (6688) :1626-1628
[7]   THE EFFECT OF NEWER GENERATION LITHOTRIPSY UPON RENAL-FUNCTION ASSESSED BY NUCLEAR SCINTIGRAPHY [J].
GUPTA, M ;
BOLTON, DM ;
IRBY, P ;
HUBNER, W ;
WOLF, JS ;
HATTNER, RS ;
STOLLER, ML .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (03) :947-950
[8]  
JONES DA, 1987, LANCET, V1, P1052
[9]   RENORENAL REFLEXES - NEURAL COMPONENTS OF IPSILATERAL AND CONTRALATERAL RENAL RESPONSES [J].
KOPP, UC ;
SMITH, LA ;
DIBONA, GF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 249 (04) :F507-F517
[10]   BLOOD-PRESSURE CHANGES FOLLOWING EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND OTHER FORMS OF TREATMENT FOR NEPHROLITHIASIS [J].
LINGEMAN, JE ;
WOODS, JR ;
TOTH, PD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (13) :1789-1794