Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients Undergoing Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

被引:137
作者
Grandin, E. Wilson [1 ,2 ]
Nunez, Jose, I [3 ]
Willar, Brooks [4 ]
Kennedy, Kevin [2 ]
Rycus, Peter [5 ]
Tonna, Joseph E. [5 ,6 ]
Kapur, Navin K. [7 ]
Shaefi, Shahzad [8 ]
Garan, A. Reshad [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Smith Ctr Outcomes Res Cardiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] UMass Mem Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med, Worcester, MA USA
[5] Extracorporeal Life Support Org, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Utah, Div Cardiothorac Surg & Emergency Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Tufts Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
intra-aortic balloon pump; percutaneous ventricular assist device; survival; unloading; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; SUPPORT; IMPELLA; SURVIVAL; IMPLANTATION; DISTENSION; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) increases left ventricular (LV) after-load, potentially provoking LV distention and impairing recovery. LV mechanical unloading (MU) with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) can prevent LV distension, potentially at the risk of more complications, and net clinical benefit remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES This study aims to determine the association between MU and outcomes for patients undergoing VA-ECMO. METHODS The authors queried the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry for adults receiving peripheral VA-ECMO from 2010 to 2019 and stratified them by MU with IABP or pVAD. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included on-support mortality and complications during VA-ECMO. RESULTS Among 12,734 VA-ECMO patients, 3,399 (26.7%) received MU: 2,782 (82.9%) IABP and 580 (17.1%) pVAD. MU patients were older (age 56.3 vs 52.7 years) and, before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, more often required >2 vasopressors (41.7% vs 27.2%) and had respiratory (21.1% vs 15.9%), renal (24.6% vs 15.8%), and liver failure (4.4% vs 3.1%) (all P < 0.001). MU patients had lower in-hospital mortality (56.6% vs 59.3%, P = 0.006), which persisted in multivariable modeling (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77-0.92; P < 0.001). MU was associated with more cannula site bleeding (aOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.11-1.40; P < 0.001) and hemolysis (aOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.03-1.57; P = 0.02). Compared to pVAD, MU patients with IABP had similar mortality (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-1.01; P = 0.06) and less medical bleeding (aOR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001), cannula site bleeding (aOR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.96; P = 0.03), and renal injury (aOR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Among adults receiving VA-ECMO, MU was associated with lower in-hospital mortality despite increased complications including hemolysis and cannulation site bleeding. Compared to pVAD, MU with IABP was associated with similar mortality and lower complication rates. (C) 2022 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Alushi, Brunilda ;
Douedari, Andel ;
Froehlig, Georg ;
Knie, Wulf ;
Wurster, Thomas H. ;
Leistner, David M. ;
Staehli, Barbara-Elisabeth ;
Mochmann, Hans-Christian ;
Pieske, Burkert ;
Landmesser, Ulf ;
Krackhardt, Florian ;
Skurk, Carsten .
OPEN HEART, 2019, 6 (01)
[2]   The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support [J].
Amin, Amit P. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Curtis, Jeptha P. ;
Desai, Nihar ;
Masoudi, Frederick A. ;
Bach, Richard G. ;
McNeely, Christian ;
Al-Badarin, Firas ;
House, John A. ;
Kulkarni, Hemant ;
Rao, Sunil, V .
CIRCULATION, 2020, 141 (04) :273-284
[3]   The Effect of Intraaortic Balloon Pumping Under Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on Mortality of Cardiogenic Patients: An Analysis Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database [J].
Aso, Shotaro ;
Matsui, Hiroki ;
Fushirni, Kiyohide ;
Yasunaga, Hideo .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (11) :1974-1979
[4]   Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 10 (02) :150-161
[5]   Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J].
Cevasco, Marisa ;
Takayama, Hiroo ;
Ando, Masahiko ;
Garan, Arthur R. ;
Naka, Yoshifumi ;
Takeda, Koji .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 (04) :1676-1683
[6]   Concurrent initiation of intra-aortic balloon pumping with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation reduced in-hospital mortality in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Hou, Jianfeng ;
Tang, Hanwei ;
Hu, Shengshou .
ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 9
[7]   Impella to Unload the Left Ventricle During Peripheral Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation [J].
Cheng, Allen ;
Swartz, Michael F. ;
Massey, H. Todd .
ASAIO JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (05) :533-536
[8]  
Cheng R, 2015, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V27, P453
[9]   Hemocompatibility-Related Adverse Events and Survival on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support An ELSO Registry Analysis [J].
Chung, Mabel ;
Cabezas, Fausto R. ;
Nunez, Jose I. ;
Kennedy, Kevin F. ;
Rick, Katelyn ;
Rycus, Peter ;
Mehra, Mandeep R. ;
Garan, A. Reshad ;
Kociol, Robb D. ;
Grandin, E. Wilson .
JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 8 (11) :892-902
[10]   Vascular complications following intra-aortic balloon pump implantation: an updated review [J].
de Jong, Monique M. ;
Lorusso, Roberto ;
Al Awami, Fatima ;
Matteuci, Francesco ;
Parise, Orlando ;
Lozekoot, Pieter ;
Bonacchi, Massimo ;
Maessen, Jos G. ;
Johnson, Daniel M. ;
Gelsomino, Sandro .
PERFUSION-UK, 2018, 33 (02) :96-104