Happy Facial Expressions Impair Inhibitory Control With Respect to Fearful Facial Expressions but Only When Task-Relevant

被引:57
作者
Mancini, Christian [1 ]
Falciati, Luca [1 ]
Maioli, Claudio [1 ]
Mirabella, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Viale Europa 11, I-25123 Brescia, Italy
[2] IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
关键词
inhibitory control; emotion; facial expressions; task-relevance; Go; No-go task; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; NEURAL MECHANISMS; POSITIVE AFFECT; MODULATION; EMOTION; FACES; PERCEPTION; AMYGDALA; THREAT;
D O I
10.1037/emo0001058
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The ability to generate appropriate responses, especially in social contexts, requires integrating emotional information with ongoing cognitive processes. In particular, inhibitory control plays a crucial role in social interactions, preventing the execution of impulsive and inappropriate actions. In this study, we focused on the impact of facial emotional expressions on inhibition. Research in this field has provided highly mixed results. In our view, a crucial factor explaining such inconsistencies is the task-relevance of the emotional content of the stimuli. To clarify this issue, we gave two versions of a Go/No-go task to healthy participants. In the emotional version, participants had to withhold a reaching movement at the presentation of emotional facial expressions (fearful or happy) and move when neutral faces were shown. The same pictures were displayed in the other version, but participants had to act according to the actor's gender, ignoring the emotional valence of the faces. We found that happy expressions impaired inhibitory control with respect to fearful expressions, but only when they were relevant to the participants' goal. We interpret these results as suggesting that facial emotions do not influence behavioral responses automatically. They would instead do so only when they are intrinsically germane for ongoing goals.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 152
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Fear, faces, and the human amygdala [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) :166-172
[2]   When Emotions Matter : Focusing on Emotion Improves Working Memory Updating in Older Adults [J].
Berger, Natalie ;
Richards, Anne ;
Davelaar, Eddy J. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[3]   Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Berkman, Elliot T. ;
Burklund, Lisa ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 47 (02) :705-712
[4]   The effects of DAT1 genotype on fMRI activation in an emotional go/no-go task [J].
Brown, Brenna K. ;
Murrell, Jill ;
Karne, Harish ;
Anand, Amit .
BRAIN IMAGING AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 11 (01) :185-193
[5]  
Compton Rebecca J, 2003, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V2, P115, DOI 10.1177/1534582303002002003
[6]   Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence [J].
Crivelli, Carlos ;
Fridlund, Alan J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (05) :388-399
[7]   A Tale of Two Negatives: Differential Memory Modulation by Threat-Related Facial Expressions [J].
Davis, F. Caroline ;
Somerville, Leah H. ;
Ruberry, Erika J. ;
Berry, Andrew B. L. ;
Shin, Lisa M. ;
Whalen, Paul J. .
EMOTION, 2011, 11 (03) :647-655
[8]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72
[9]   How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability [J].
Dreisbach, G .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2006, 60 (01) :11-19
[10]  
Ekman P, 1976, PICTURES FACIAL AFFE