Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs

被引:53
作者
Digel, Christoph [1 ]
Riede, Jens O. [1 ]
Brose, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, JF Blumenbach Inst Zool & Anthropol, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION; INTERACTION STRENGTH; SPECIES ABUNDANCE; COMPLEX; STABILITY; NETWORKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18862.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The distributions of body masses and degrees (i.e. the number of trophic links) across species are key determinants of food-web structure and dynamics. In particular, allometric degree distributions combining both aspects in the relationship between degrees and body masses are of critical importance for the stability of these complex ecological networks. They describe decreases in vulnerability (i.e. the number of predators) and increases in generality (i.e. the number of prey) with increasing species 'body masses. We used an entirely new global body-mass database containing 94 food webs from four different ecosystem types (17 terrestrial, 7 marine, 54 lake, 16 stream ecosystems) to analyze (1) body mass distributions, (2) cumulative degree distributions (vulnerability, generality, linkedness), and (3) allometric degree distributions (e.g. generality - body mass relationships) for significant differences among ecosystem types. Our results demonstrate some general patterns across ecosystems: (1) the body masses are often roughly log-normally (terrestrial and stream ecosystems) or multi-modally (lake and marine ecosystems) distributed, and (2) most networks exhibit exponential cumulative degree distributions except stream networks that most often possess uniform degree distributions. Additionally, with increasing species body masses we found signifi cant decreases in vulnerability in 70% of the food webs and signifi cant increases in generality in 80% of the food webs. Surprisingly, the slopes of these allometric degree distributions were roughly three times steeper in streams than in the other ecosystem types, which implies that streams exhibit a more pronounced body mass structure. Overall, our analyses documented some striking generalities in the body-mass (allometric degree distributions of generality and vulnerability) and degree structure (exponential degree distributions) across ecosystem types as well as surprising exceptions (uniform degree distributions in stream ecosystems). This suggests general constraints of body masses on the link structure of natural food webs irrespective of ecosystem characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 509
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Statistical mechanics of complex networks
    Albert, R
    Barabási, AL
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) : 47 - 97
  • [2] Who dominates whom in the ecosystem? Energy flow bottlenecks and cascading extinctions
    Allesina, S
    Bodini, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) : 351 - 358
  • [3] A general model for food web structure
    Allesina, Stefano
    Alonso, David
    Pascual, Mercedes
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5876) : 658 - 661
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1927, Animal Ecology
  • [5] Emergence of scaling in random networks
    Barabási, AL
    Albert, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) : 509 - 512
  • [6] The "Goldilocks factor" in food webs
    Berlow, Eric L.
    Brose, Ulrich
    Martinez, Neo D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (11) : 4079 - 4080
  • [7] Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs
    Berlow, Eric L.
    Dunne, Jennifer A.
    Martinez, Neo D.
    Stark, Philip B.
    Williams, Richard J.
    Brose, Ulrich
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (01) : 187 - 191
  • [8] Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes
    Brose, U.
    Ehnes, R. B.
    Rall, B. C.
    Vucic-Pestic, O.
    Berlow, E. L.
    Scheu, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (05) : 1072 - 1078
  • [9] BROSE U, 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P25
  • [10] Brose U, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, P2411, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:CBRINF]2.0.CO