Reliability and validity of an indicator system used to evaluate outpatient and inpatient satisfaction in Chinese hospitals

被引:15
|
作者
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Zhou, Feng [2 ]
Ge, Xiaoxiang [3 ]
Ran, Xu [4 ]
Li, Yeping [4 ]
Chen, Si [5 ]
Dai, Xiaotong [5 ]
Chen, Dafang [5 ]
Jiang, Baoguo [6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Neurol, Peoples Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Data Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Army Mil Med Univ, Off Acad Affairs, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Hosp Management Ltd Co, Doctor Patient Experience Res Base, Natl Hlth & Family Planning Commiss Peoples Repub, Dept Res & Dev, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Dept Orthoped, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen South Main St, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
patient satisfaction questionnaire; reliability; validity; evaluation;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S186722
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Patient satisfaction is one of the important ways to measure the results of treatment and the quality of medical services. The purpose of the present study was to verify the reliability and validity of the indicator system for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients and inpatients in Chinese hospitals. Methods: The study was based on the satisfaction questionnaire program of the national doctor-patient experience research center with data from 99,802 outpatients and 229,215 inpatients, collected in China between 2016 and 2017. We adopted exploratory factor analysis for validity analysis and the method of split-half reliability and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for reliability analysis. Results: In the validity analysis of the indicator system for outpatients, the factor loading was between 0.438 and 0.919, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for nonsurgical inpatients, the factor loading of the secondary indicators was between 0.417 and 0.75, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for surgical inpatients satisfaction, the factor loading of the secondary indicators range was 0.391-0.751, and the reliability was excellent. Conclusion: The indicator systems for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients, surgical inpatients and nonsurgical inpatients all have excellent reliability and good validity. They can be widely used for an outpatient and inpatient satisfaction questionnaire in Chinese hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:2527 / 2536
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Nine-Item Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Scale Based on Self-Determination Theory With Older Adults
    Yang, Yuting
    Yao, Miao
    Yang, Yongwei
    Ye, Qiong
    Lin, Ting
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [22] Measuring social skills of children and adolescents in a Chinese population: Preliminary evidence on the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS-C)
    Cheung, Phoebe P. P.
    Siu, Andrew M. H.
    Brown, Ted
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2017, 60 : 187 - 197
  • [23] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57)
    Cai, Tingting
    Wu, Fulei
    Huang, Qingmei
    Yu, Chunfang
    Yang, Yang
    Ni, Feixia
    Yuan, Changrong
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [24] Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57)
    Tingting Cai
    Fulei Wu
    Qingmei Huang
    Chunfang Yu
    Yang Yang
    Feixia Ni
    Changrong Yuan
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20