Reliability and validity of an indicator system used to evaluate outpatient and inpatient satisfaction in Chinese hospitals

被引:15
|
作者
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Zhou, Feng [2 ]
Ge, Xiaoxiang [3 ]
Ran, Xu [4 ]
Li, Yeping [4 ]
Chen, Si [5 ]
Dai, Xiaotong [5 ]
Chen, Dafang [5 ]
Jiang, Baoguo [6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Neurol, Peoples Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Data Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Army Mil Med Univ, Off Acad Affairs, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Hosp Management Ltd Co, Doctor Patient Experience Res Base, Natl Hlth & Family Planning Commiss Peoples Repub, Dept Res & Dev, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Dept Orthoped, Peoples Hosp, 11 Xizhimen South Main St, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
patient satisfaction questionnaire; reliability; validity; evaluation;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S186722
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Patient satisfaction is one of the important ways to measure the results of treatment and the quality of medical services. The purpose of the present study was to verify the reliability and validity of the indicator system for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients and inpatients in Chinese hospitals. Methods: The study was based on the satisfaction questionnaire program of the national doctor-patient experience research center with data from 99,802 outpatients and 229,215 inpatients, collected in China between 2016 and 2017. We adopted exploratory factor analysis for validity analysis and the method of split-half reliability and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for reliability analysis. Results: In the validity analysis of the indicator system for outpatients, the factor loading was between 0.438 and 0.919, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for nonsurgical inpatients, the factor loading of the secondary indicators was between 0.417 and 0.75, and the reliability was excellent. In the validity analysis of the indicator system for surgical inpatients satisfaction, the factor loading of the secondary indicators range was 0.391-0.751, and the reliability was excellent. Conclusion: The indicator systems for evaluating satisfaction of outpatients, surgical inpatients and nonsurgical inpatients all have excellent reliability and good validity. They can be widely used for an outpatient and inpatient satisfaction questionnaire in Chinese hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:2527 / 2536
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] The reliability and validity of the inpatient satisfaction questionnaire as an instrument for measuring inpatient satisfaction
    陈平雁
    胡静
    张超
    欧春泉
    JournalofMedicalCollegesofPLA, 2000, (01) : 22 - 28
  • [2] A patient satisfaction instrument for outpatient physical therapy clinics: reliability and validity
    Tuzun, Emine Handan
    Eker, Levent
    Daskapan, Arzu
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-FIZYOTERAPI REHABILITASYON, 2009, 20 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [3] Reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing
    Jing-Hua Shi
    Lu Liu
    Ya-Qin Li
    ChineseNursingResearch, 2016, 3 (04) : 158 - 161
  • [4] Life Satisfaction of Adolescents in Hunan, China: Reliability and Validity of Chinese Brief Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS)
    Man Ye
    Lezhi Li
    Yingxia Li
    Ruoling Shen
    Shali Wen
    Jingping Zhang
    Social Indicators Research, 2014, 118 : 515 - 522
  • [5] Life Satisfaction of Adolescents in Hunan, China: Reliability and Validity of Chinese Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS)
    Ye, Man
    Li, Lezhi
    Li, Yingxia
    Shen, Ruoling
    Wen, Shali
    Zhang, Jingping
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 118 (02) : 515 - 522
  • [6] Emergency, veterinary clinical services and patient owners satisfaction criteria scales in animal hospitals: Validity and reliability study
    Cevrimli, Mustafa Bahadir
    Mat, Burak
    Gunlu, Aytekin
    Tekindal, Mustafa Agah
    Gunlu, Zehra
    ANKARA UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2019, 66 (03): : 247 - 254
  • [7] Development and validation of a Chinese outpatient satisfaction questionnaire: evidence from 46 public general hospitals and 5151 outpatients
    Wei, J.
    Shen, L.
    Yang, H. -B.
    Qin, J. -B.
    Huang, W.
    Zhang, J. -J.
    Gong, Q. -Y.
    Li, X. -X.
    Yang, T. -B.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 129 (11) : 1523 - 1529
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older people
    Dong, Lijuan
    Liu, Na
    Tian, Xiaoyu
    Qiao, Xiaoxia
    Gobbens, Robbert J. J.
    Kane, Robert L.
    Wang, Cuili
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2017, 73 : 21 - 28
  • [9] A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care
    Pedersen, Henrik
    Havnen, Audun
    Brattmyr, Martin
    Attkisson, C. Clifford
    Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care
    Henrik Pedersen
    Audun Havnen
    Martin Brattmyr
    C. Clifford Attkisson
    Mariela L. Lara-Cabrera
    BMC Psychiatry, 22