Characterization of acoustic detection efficiency using a gliding robotic fish as a mobile receiver platform

被引:12
作者
Ennasr, Osama [1 ]
Holbrook, Christopher [2 ]
Hondorp, Darryl W. [3 ]
Krueger, Charles C. [4 ]
Coleman, Demetris [1 ]
Solanki, Pratap [1 ]
Thon, John [1 ]
Tan, Xiaobo [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Smart Microsyst Lab, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Hammond Bay Biol Stn, 11188 Ray Rd, Millersburg, MI 49759 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Great Lakes Sci Ctr, 1451 Green Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Autonomous underwater vehicles; Underwater glider; Gliding robotic fish; Acoustic telemetry; Detection efficiency; OCEAN TRACKING NETWORK; ATLANTIC STURGEON; UNDERWATER; SHARK;
D O I
10.1186/s40317-020-00219-7
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
BackgroundAutonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and animal telemetry have become important tools for understanding the relationships between aquatic organisms and their environment, but more information is needed to guide the development and use of AUVs as effective animal tracking platforms. A forward-facing acoustic telemetry receiver (VR2Tx 69 kHz; VEMCO, Bedford, Nova Scotia) attached to a novel AUV (gliding robotic fish) was tested in a freshwater lake to (1) compare its detection efficiency (i.e., the probability of detecting an acoustic signal emitted by a tag) of acoustic tags (VEMCO model V8-4H 69 kHz) to stationary receivers and (2) determine if detection efficiency was related to distance between tag and receiver, direction of movement (toward or away from transmitter), depth, or pitch.ResultsDetection efficiency for mobile (robot-mounted) and stationary receivers were similar at ranges less than 300 m, on average across all tests, but detection efficiency for the mobile receiver decreased faster than for stationary receivers at distances greater than 300 m. Detection efficiency was higher when the robot was moving toward the transmitter than when moving away from the transmitter. Detection efficiency decreased with depth (surface to 4 m) when the robot was moving away from the transmitter, but depth had no significant effect on detection efficiency when the robot was moving toward the transmitter. Detection efficiency was higher when the robot was descending (pitched downward) than ascending (pitched upward) when moving toward the transmitter, but pitch had no significant effect when moving away from the transmitter.ConclusionResults suggested that much of the observed variation in detection efficiency is related to shielding of the acoustic signal by the robot body depending on the positions and orientation of the hydrophone relative to the transmitter. Results are expected to inform hardware, software, and operational changes to gliding robotic fish that will improve detection efficiency. Regardless, data on the size and shape of detection efficiency curves for gliding robotic fish will be useful for planning future missions and should be relevant to other AUVs for telemetry. With refinements, gliding robotic fish could be a useful platform for active tracking of acoustic tags in certain environments.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Global Forecast System (GFS) | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
  • [2] Dynamic seascapes predict the marine occurrence of an endangered species: Atlantic Sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus
    Breece, Matthew W.
    Fox, Dewayne A.
    Dunton, Keith J.
    Frisk, Mike G.
    Jordaan, Adrian
    Oliver, Matthew J.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 7 (06): : 725 - 733
  • [3] Carlon R, 2015, OCEANS-IEEE
  • [4] Cimino M., 2018, Anim. Biotelemetry, V6, DOI [10.1186/s40317-018-0160-4, DOI 10.1186/S40317-018-0160-4]
  • [5] Tracking and Following a Tagged Leopard Shark with an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
    Clark, Christopher M.
    Forney, Christina
    Manii, Esfandiar
    Shinzaki, Dylan
    Gage, Chris
    Farris, Michael
    Lowe, Christopher G.
    Moline, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2013, 30 (03) : 309 - 322
  • [6] Ocean Tracking Network Canada: A Network Approach to Addressing Critical Issues in Fisheries and Resource Management with Implications for Ocean Governance
    Cooke, Steven J.
    Iverson, Sara J.
    Stokesbury, Michael J. W.
    Hinch, Scott G.
    Fisk, Aaron T.
    VanderZwaag, David L.
    Apostle, Richard
    Whoriskey, Fred
    [J]. FISHERIES, 2011, 36 (12) : 583 - 592
  • [7] Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals
    Espinoza, Mario
    Farrugia, Thomas J.
    Webber, Dale M.
    Smith, Frank
    Lowe, Christopher G.
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2011, 108 (2-3) : 364 - 371
  • [8] Grothues T.M., 2008, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, 2008. AUV 2008. Woods Hole, MA
  • [9] Habitat selection of a coastal shark species estimated from an autonomous underwater vehicle
    Haulsee, D. E.
    Breece, M. W.
    Miller, D. C.
    Wetherbee, B. M.
    Fox, D. A.
    Oliver, M. J.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2015, 528 : 277 - 288
  • [10] Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays
    Heupel, MR
    Semmens, JM
    Hobday, AJ
    [J]. MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2006, 57 (01) : 1 - 13