Factors that affect implementation of a nurse staffing directive: results from a qualitative multi-case evaluation

被引:10
作者
Robinson, Claire H. [1 ]
Annis, Ann M. [1 ]
Forman, Jane [1 ]
Krein, Sarah L. [1 ]
Yankey, Nicholas [1 ]
Duffy, Sonia A. [1 ]
Taylor, Beth [2 ]
Sales, Anne E. [1 ]
机构
[1] VA Ann Arbor Hlth Care Syst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] VA Southern Arizona Hlth Care Syst, Patient Care Serv, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
acute care; budget; evaluation research; health services research; implementation; nurse staffing; policy; qualitative approaches; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; workforce issues; OUTCOMES; PATIENT; CARE; HOSPITALS; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1111/jan.12961
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim/sTo assess implementation of the Veterans Health Administration staffing methodology directive. BackgroundIn 2010 the Veterans Health Administration promulgated a staffing methodology directive for inpatient nursing units to address staffing and budget forecasting. DesignA qualitative multi-case evaluation approach assessed staffing methodology implementation. MethodsSemi-structured telephone interviews were conducted from March - June 2014 with Nurse Executives and their teams at 21 facilities. Interviews focused on the budgeting process, implementation experiences, use of data, leadership support, and training. An implementation score was created for each facility using a 4-point rating scale. The scores were used to select three facilities (low, medium and high implementation) for more detailed case studies. Results/findingsAfter analysing interview summaries, the evaluation team developed a four domain scoring structure: (1) integration of staffing methodology into budget development; (2) implementation of the Directive elements; (3) engagement of leadership and staff; and (4) use of data to support the staffing methodology process. The high implementation facility had leadership understanding and endorsement of staffing methodology, confidence in and ability to work with data, and integration of staffing methodology results into the budgeting process. The low implementation facility reported poor leadership engagement and little understanding of data sources and interpretation. ConclusionImplementation varies widely across facilities. Implementing staffing methodology in facilities with complex and changing staffing needs requires substantial commitment at all organizational levels especially for facilities that have traditionally relied on historical levels to budget for staffing.
引用
收藏
页码:1886 / 1898
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: cross-national findings
    Aiken, LH
    Clarke, SP
    Sloane, DM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [2] Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction
    Aiken, LH
    Clarke, SP
    Sloane, DM
    Sochalski, J
    Silber, JH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (16): : 1987 - 1993
  • [3] How Have Mandated Nurse Staffing Ratios Affected Hospitals? Perspectives from California Hospital Leaders
    Chapman, Susan A.
    Spetz, Joanne
    Seago, Jean Ann
    Kaiser, Jennifer
    Dower, Catherine
    Herrera, Carolina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 54 (05) : 321 - 333
  • [4] Creswell J.W., 2011, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
  • [5] The Economic Value of Professional Nursing
    Dall, Timothy M.
    Chen, Yaozhu J.
    Seifert, Rita Furst
    Maddox, Peggy I.
    Hogan, Paul F.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [6] Self-Compassion and Risk Behavior Among People Living With HIV/AIDS
    de Cordova, Pamela B.
    Phibbs, Ciaran S.
    Schmitt, Susan K.
    Stone, Patricia W.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2014, 37 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [7] Nursing staffing, nursing workload, the work environment and patient outcomes
    Duffield, Christine
    Diers, Donna
    O'Brien-Pallas, Linda
    Aisbett, Chris
    Roche, Michael
    King, Madeleine
    Aisbett, Kate
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2011, 24 (04) : 244 - 255
  • [8] Englebright Jane, 2008, Nurs Adm Q, V32, P188, DOI 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000325175.30923.ff
  • [9] Fitzpatrick T, 2013, NURS ECON, V31, P221
  • [10] Harrell M.C., 2009, DATA COLLECTION METH