Preliminary results using a newly developed projection method to visualize vascular anatomy prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction

被引:22
作者
Hummelink, S. [1 ]
Hameeteman, M. [1 ]
Hoogeveen, Y. [1 ]
Slump, C. H. [2 ]
Ulrich, D. J. O. [1 ]
Kool, L. J. Schultze [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
DIEP flap breast reconstruction; Pico video projector; Computer tomography angiography; Virtual planning; Perforator mapping; PERFORATOR FLAP; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: In a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is currently considered as the gold standard in preoperative imaging for this procedure. Unidirectional Doppler ultrasound (US) is frequently used; however, this method does not distinguish the main axial vessels from perforator arteries at the height of the fascia, it has a limited penetration depth, and it cannot assess the branching patterns of the deep inferior arteries. A new method and system were developed, which consisted of a video projector preoperatively displaying the location and intramuscular course of the artery perforators and subcutaneous branching on the patient's abdomen. Method: All patients (n = 9) underwent a standard protocol: a preoperative CTA was performed and the DIEPs were localized using a unidirectional Doppler probe. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the perforator locations based on CTA was projected on the abdomen of the patients. All projected perforator locations were assessed using a unidirectional Doppler probe. The intraoperative results were collected for comparison. Results: A total of 88 locations were marked with the use of unidirectional Doppler and a total of 100 perforators were projected (p = 0.38). In 98 out of 100 projected perforator locations, a Doppler signal was audible. The intraoperative results demonstrate that 19 out of 34 transplanted perforators were correctly identified with unidirectional Doppler (56.9% +/- 31.4%), where the projection method properly revealed 29 locations (84.3% +/- 25.8%) (p = 0.030). Conclusion: The projection method is not only capable of providing more information and identifying more perforators used for transplantation than unidirectional Doppler probing but also more accurate in pointing out the corresponding perforator found intraoperatively. (C) 2014 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction
    Otte, M.
    Andree, C.
    Hagouan, M.
    Richrath, P.
    Abu-Ghazaleh, A.
    Munder, B.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2015, 47 (04) : 222 - 227
  • [2] A New and Innovative Method of Preoperatively Planning and Projecting Vascular Anatomy in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hummelink, Stefan
    Hoogeveen, Yvonne L.
    Kool, Leo J. Schultze
    Ulrich, Dietmar J. O.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (06) : 1151E - 1158E
  • [3] A Novel Method to Estimate the Weight of the DIEP Flap in Breast Reconstruction: DIEP-W, a Simple Calculation Formula Using Paraumbilical Flap Thickness
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    Kim, Eun-Ji
    Lee, Kyeong-Tae
    Mun, Goo-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2016, 32 (07) : 520 - 527
  • [4] The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Preliminary results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Bubberman, Jeske M.
    Brandts, Lloyd
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    Tuinder, Stefania M. H.
    BREAST, 2024, 74
  • [5] Displaying inguinal lymph nodes before transplantation in a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction using an innovative projection method
    Hummelink, S.
    Kool, L. J. Schultze
    Ulrich, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (03) : 376 - 380