Unpacking government social media messaging strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in China

被引:19
作者
Li, Yiran [1 ]
Chandra, Yanto [2 ]
Fan, Yingying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Dept Govt & Publ Adm, Fac Social Sci, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Social Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Hung Hom,Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
POLICY AND INTERNET | 2022年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
COVID-19; government posts; response strategy; situational crisis communication theory; social media; WEB; 2.0; CRISIS; COMMUNICATION; EMERGENCY; TWITTER; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; CITIZENS; CORPORATE; DISASTER;
D O I
10.1002/poi3.282
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
A core aspect of agile governance is effectively managing communications between a government and its citizens. However, doing so during an emergency-particularly a pandemic-is often complex and challenging. In this article, we examine how various levels of the Chinese government (central, provincial, and municipal) communicated with the public in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Analyzing government social media posts during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan ("text as data"), we conduct topic modeling analysis and identify four strategies that characterize Chinese governments' responses to a variety of issues at the ground level, which we label instructing information, adjusting information, advocacy, and bolstering. The results show that local government agencies predominantly used the first two strategies, whereas the central government mainly relied on the last two. These strategies explain how various levels of government engaged in agile governance through their communication with citizens, highlight the coordination and control work undertaken by governments at all levels, and demonstrate how these methods shielded the central government from blame for the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 672
页数:22
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector
    Andersen, Kim Normann
    Medaglia, Rony
    Vatrapu, Ravi
    Henriksen, Helle Zinner
    Gauld, Robin
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2011, 28 (04) : 439 - 445
  • [2] Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election
    Arceneaux, K
    Stein, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2006, 28 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [3] Information Dilemmas and Blame-Avoidance Strategies: From Secrecy to Lightning Rods in Chinese Health Crises
    Baekkeskov, Erik
    Rubin, Olivier
    [J]. GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2017, 30 (03): : 425 - 443
  • [4] Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data
    Barbera, Pablo
    Casas, Andreu
    Nagler, Jonathan
    Egan, Patrick J.
    Bonneau, Richard
    Jost, John T.
    Tucker, Joshua A.
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (04) : 883 - 901
  • [5] Image repair discourse and crisis communication
    Benoit, WL
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 1997, 23 (02) : 177 - 186
  • [6] Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies
    Bertot, John C.
    Jaeger, Paul T.
    Grimes, Justin M.
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 27 (03) : 264 - 271
  • [7] State Capacity, Conflict, and Development
    Besley, Timothy
    Persson, Torsten
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2010, 78 (01) : 1 - 34
  • [8] Birkland Thomas., 1997, After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events
  • [9] Probabilistic Topic Models
    Blei, David M.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2012, 55 (04) : 77 - 84
  • [10] Latent Dirichlet allocation
    Blei, DM
    Ng, AY
    Jordan, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2003, 3 (4-5) : 993 - 1022