Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle

被引:85
|
作者
Patry, C. [1 ,2 ]
Ducrocq, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Genet Anim & Biol Integrat 1313, F-78352 Jouy En Josas, France
[2] Union Natl Cooperat Elevage & Inseminat Anim, F-75595 Paris 12, France
关键词
selection bias; genomic selection; BLUP; dairy cattle; SELECTION; RELIABILITY; PEDIGREE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-3804
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A genomic preselection step of young sires is now often included in dairy cattle breeding schemes. Young sires are selected based on their genomic breeding values. They have better Mendelian sampling contribution so that the assumption of random Mendelian sampling term in genetic evaluations is clearly violated. When these sires and their progeny are evaluated using BLUP, it is feared that estimated breeding values are biased. The effect of genomic selection on genetic evaluations was studied through simulations keeping the structure of the Holstein population in France. The quality of genetic evaluations was assessed by computing bias and accuracy from the difference and correlation between true and estimated breeding values, respectively, and also the mean square error of prediction. Different levels of heritability, selection intensity, and accuracy of genomic evaluation were tested. After only one generation and whatever the scenario, breeding values of preselected young sires and their daughters were significantly underestimated and their accuracy was decreased. Genomic preselection needs to be accounted for in genetic evaluation models.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1020
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs
    Jibrila, Ibrahim
    Vandenplas, Jeremie
    ten Napel, Jan
    Bergsma, Rob
    Veerkamp, Roel F.
    Calus, Mario P. L.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [12] Genetic and genomic analyses of embryo production in dairy cattle
    Jaton, C.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Chud, T. C. S.
    Malchiodi, F.
    Sargolzaei, M.
    Price, C. A.
    Canovas, A.
    Baes, C.
    Miglior, F.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 32 (1-2) : 50 - 55
  • [13] Improving Genomic Prediction of Crossbred and Purebred Dairy Cattle
    Khansefid, Majid
    Goddard, Michael E.
    Haile-Mariam, Mekonnen
    Konstantinov, Kon, V
    Schrooten, Chris
    de Jong, Gerben
    Jewell, Erica G.
    O'Connor, Erin
    Pryce, Jennie E.
    Daetwyler, Hans D.
    MacLeod, Iona M.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [14] Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle
    Patry, Clotilde
    Ducrocq, Vincent
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
  • [15] Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle
    Kudinov, A. A.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Uimari, P.
    Stranden, I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (07) : 6299 - 6310
  • [16] Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle
    Clotilde Patry
    Vincent Ducrocq
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 43
  • [17] Genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cattle
    VanRaden, P. M.
    Tooker, M. E.
    Chud, T. C. S.
    Norman, H. D.
    Megonigal, J. H., Jr.
    Haagen, I. W.
    Wiggans, G. R.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (02) : 1620 - 1631
  • [18] Effect of synchronized breeding on genetic evaluations of fertility traits in dairy cattle
    Lynch, C.
    Oliveira, G. A., Jr.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Baes, C. F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (11) : 11820 - 11831
  • [19] Integration of genomic information into beef cattle and sheep genetic evaluations in Australia
    Swan, Andrew A.
    Johnston, David J.
    Brown, Daniel J.
    Tier, Bruce
    Graser, Hans-U.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (2-3) : 126 - 132
  • [20] Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review
    Bouquet, A.
    Juga, J.
    ANIMAL, 2013, 7 (05) : 705 - 713