Placement of SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer patients treated with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy

被引:28
|
作者
Morita, Masashi [1 ]
Fukagai, Takashi [1 ]
Hirayama, Kidai [1 ]
Yamatoya, Jin [1 ]
Noguchi, Tetsuo [1 ]
Ogawa, Yu [1 ]
Igarashi, Atsushi [1 ]
Niiya, Akifumi [2 ]
Kato, Masako [3 ]
Morota, Madoka [2 ]
Oshinomi, Kazuhiko [4 ]
Ogawa, Yoshio [4 ]
Lederer, John L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Showa Univ, Koto Toyosu Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Showa Univ, Koto Toyosu Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Showa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Div Radiat Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Showa Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Univ Hawaii Manoa, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Surg, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
hydrogel spacer; low-dose-rate brachytherapy; prostate cancer; radiotherapy; rectal dose; TOXICITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/iju.14123
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of the present study was to report on our early experience with hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR) placement in combination with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Methods From April 2018, SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer was placed in 100 consecutive patients undergoing iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Complications and the status of the placement were evaluated. Deformation of the prostate by the spacer was examined measuring prostate diameters and evaluating the change from preoperative status. The position of the prostate was similarly examined by evaluating the change in distance between the pubic symphysis and the prostate. Post-plan dosimetric data were compared with 200 patients treated without a spacer. Results No complications were found during either the intraoperative or perioperative periods. The mean displacement distance of 11.64 mm was created, the mean value before spacer placement was 0.28 mm (P < 0.0001). The change of the prostate diameters showed a positive increase in all directions, with no significant negative change in any one direction. Regarding the change in distance between pubic symphysis and the prostate, no significant shortening trend was observed between the two groups (P = 0.14). Whereas the dosimetric parameters showed means of 0.001 and 0.026 cc for RV150 and RV100 in the spacer group, they were 0.025 and 0.318 cc, respectively, in the non-spacer group, showing a significant decrease in both parameters (P < 0.001). Conclusions Prostate deformation secondary to hydrogel placement might adversely affect dosimetric parameters in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, a significant reduction in the rectal dose can be adopted without adversely affecting the other parameters related to treatment outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 66
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A machine-learning approach based on 409 treatments to predict optimal number of iodine-125 seeds in low-dose-rate prostate
    Boussion, Nicolas
    Schick, Ulrike
    Dissaux, Gurvan
    Ollivier, Luc
    Goasduff, Gaelle
    Pradier, Olivier
    Valeri, Antoine
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (05) : 541 - 548
  • [32] The impact of trainee involvement on outcomes in low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Shaikh, Talha
    Wang, Lora
    Ruth, Karen
    Hallman, Mark
    Chen, David Y.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Li, Jinsheng
    Crawford, Kevin
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2016, 15 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [33] First report of transperineal polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer use to curtail rectal radiation dose after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy
    Beydoun, Nadine
    Bucci, Joseph A.
    Chin, Yaw S.
    Malouf, David
    Enari, Ese
    Painter, Samuel D.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (04) : 368 - 374
  • [34] Radiation protection and dosimetry issues for patients with prostate cancer after I-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy permanent implant
    Licciardello, Tiziana
    Feliciani, Giacomo
    Mazzotti, Giorgio
    Mostacci, Domiziano
    Sarnelli, Anna
    Menghi, Enrico
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (01) : 272 - 278
  • [35] Dose Distribution of High Dose-Rate and Low Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy at Different Intervals-Impact of a Hydrogel Spacer and Prostate Volume
    Haddad, Hathal
    Hermani, Horst
    Hanitzsch, Herbert
    Heidrich, Albert
    Pinkawa, Michael
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [36] The oncologic and safety outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (03) : 127 - 133
  • [37] INFLUENCE OF DOSE ON RISK OF ACUTE URINARY RETENTION AFTER IODINE-125 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY
    Roeloffzen, Ellen M. A.
    Battermann, Jan J.
    van Deursen, Marijke J. H.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Visscher, Mareije I.
    Moerland, Marinus A.
    van Vulpen, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (04): : 1072 - 1079
  • [38] Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients' outcomes
    Lin, Yuan-Hong
    Loon, Wee
    Tacey, Mark
    Bolton, Damien
    Tan, Alwin
    Chan, Yee
    Cham, Chee Wee
    Ho, Huong
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Foroudi, Farshad
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    McMillan, Kevin
    Koufogiannis, George
    Manohar, Paul
    Liu, Madalena
    Pham, Trung
    Chao, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (06) : 605 - 614
  • [39] Duration of α-1 adrenergic antagonist administration after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer
    Onishi, Kenta
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Maesaka, Fumisato
    Tomizawa, Mitsuru
    Shimizu, Takuto
    Hori, Shunta
    Gotoh, Daisuke
    Miyake, Makito
    Yamaki, Kaori
    Asakawa, Isao
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    Tanaka, Nobumichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (12) : 1343 - 1350
  • [40] Impact of Gleason Pattern 5 on outcomes of patients with prostate cancer and iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Miwa, Sotaro
    Koshida, Kiyoshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 4 (04) : 152 - 155