Gamification of Online Surveys: A Systematic Mapping

被引:3
作者
Oliveira, Kayque W. R. [1 ]
Paula, Melise M. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Itajuba, BR-37500903 Itajuba, Brazil
关键词
Games; Visualization; Systematics; Government; Libraries; Software; Boring; Engagement; gamification; gamified surveys; online surveys; ENGAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/TG.2020.3004366
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Online surveys have become a practical and common means of collecting data by using software for various purposes. However, they can present problems, by becoming long, costly, and boring, directly affecting participation and engagement. Given that, different approaches have been proposed as a way to minimize such negative effects. Gamification has been considered as an alternative to make online surveys more pleasant and dynamic, and they contribute to the quality of results. The objective of this article was to carry out systematic mapping of the literature as a way to better understand the impact caused by gamification in online surveys. In this article, 26 articles were selected and classified, allowing the identification of the most used game elements and studies that showed performance comparisons between gamified and nongamified research. Although the results of the studies analyzed were not conclusive, the gamified survey was considered attractive and easy to be answered by the participants.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 309
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Gamified online survey to elicit citizens' preferences and enhance learning for environmental decisions [J].
Aubert, Alice H. ;
Lienert, Judit .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 111 :1-12
[2]   Gamification in market research Increasing enjoyment, participant engagement and richness of data, but what of data validity? [J].
Bailey, Pippa ;
Pritchard, Gareth ;
Kernohan, Hollie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 57 (01) :17-28
[3]   Adventures with Lex: The gamification of research? [J].
Barwick, Joanna ;
Watkins, Dawn ;
Kirk, Elee ;
Law, Effie .
CONVERGENCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH INTO NEW MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 24 (03) :229-250
[4]   ONLINE SURVEY TOOLS: ETHICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONCERNS OF HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES [J].
Buchanan, Elizabeth A. ;
Hvizdak, Erin E. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2009, 4 (02) :37-48
[5]   Academic search mechanisms: a quantitative analysis [J].
Buchinger, Diego ;
de Siqueira Cavalcanti, Gustavo Andriolli ;
Hounsell, Marcelo da Silva .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE COMPUTACAO APLICADA, 2014, 6 (01) :108-120
[6]  
Cechanowicz J., 2013, Proc. First Int. Conf. Gameful Des. Res. Appl. - Gamification '13, P58, DOI DOI 10.1145/2583008.2583016
[7]   Personalization of Gamification in Collaborative Learning Contexts using Ontologies [J].
Challco, G. C. ;
Moreira, D. A. ;
Bittencourt, I. I. ;
Mizoguchi, R. ;
Isotani, S. .
IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 13 (06) :1995-2002
[8]  
Classe T., 2016, iSys-Brazilian Journal of Information Systems, V9, P58
[9]   DYNAMIC, INTERACTIVE SURVEY QUESTIONS CAN INCREASE SURVEY DATA QUALITY [J].
Dolnicar, Sara ;
Gruen, Bettina ;
Yanamandram, Venkata .
JOURNAL OF TRAVEL & TOURISM MARKETING, 2013, 30 (07) :690-699
[10]  
Dorcec L., 2018, 2018 3 INT C SMART S, P2