A joint optimal emissions tax and solid waste tax for extended producer responsibility

被引:11
|
作者
Yi, Yongxi [1 ]
Liu, Shiyang [1 ]
Fu, Chunyan [1 ]
Li, Yuqiong [1 ]
Mi, Zhifu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South China, Sch Econ Management & Law, Hengyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Extend producer responsibility; Joint emissions tax and waste tax; Emission reduction; Waste recycling; Differentiated products; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPETITION; MODEL; INNOVATION; SUBSIDIES; INDUSTRY; POLICIES; COURNOT; MARKET; GAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For better implementing extended producer responsibility (EPR), this paper proposes a new environmental management mechanism. It allows producers to shoulder the dual responsibilities of emissions abatement and waste recycling at the lowest possible cost. For this reason, we develop a dual game model that includes a Stackelberg game between a government and manufacturers and a Cournot game between manufacturers in a differentiated product market. Moreover, we draw the following critical management insights through model analysis: (1) There is a joint optimal emissions tax and solid waste tax mechanism to implement extended producer responsibility. (2) The two tax portfolio policies lead to higher pollution reduction, waste recycling, and social welfare. (3) Higher environmental taxes result in a cleaner environment but do not necessarily lead to lower profits for oligopolies. Furthermore, according to different implementation contexts, we propose the optimal adjustment path of the joint optimal emissions tax-waste tax mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multimodal packaging waste brand identification approach for extended producer responsibility traceability
    Arbelaez-Estrada, Juan Carlos
    Aguilar-Castro, Jose
    Vallejo-Correa, Paola
    Correa, Daniel
    Ruiz-Arenas, Santiago
    Rendon-Velez, Elizabeth
    Rios-Zapata, David
    Alvarado, Joan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 487
  • [32] Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: the gap between economic theory and implementation
    Dubois, Maarten
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (09) : 36 - 42
  • [33] Extended Producer Responsibility in Thailand Prospects for Policies on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
    Manomaivibool, Panate
    Vassanadumrongdee, Sujitra
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (02) : 185 - 205
  • [34] Achievements and policy trends of extended producer responsibility for plastic packaging waste in Europe
    Shari Lorang
    Zhan Yang
    Hua Zhang
    Fan Lü
    Pinjing He
    Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy, 2022, 4 : 91 - 103
  • [35] Extended Producer Responsibility for waste televisions and computers: A regulatory evaluation of the Australian experience
    Lodhia, Sumit
    Martin, Nigel
    Rice, John
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 927 - 938
  • [36] Extended producer responsibility for waste electronics - An example of printer recycling in the United Kingdom
    Mayers, CK
    France, CM
    Cowell, SJ
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 9 (03) : 169 - 189
  • [37] Achievements and policy trends of extended producer responsibility for plastic packaging waste in Europe
    Lorang, Shari
    Yang, Zhan
    Zhang, Hua
    Lu, Fan
    He, Pinjing
    WASTE DISPOSAL & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2022, 4 (02) : 91 - 103
  • [38] Extended producer responsibility for E-waste management: Policy drivers and challenges
    Leclerc, Stephanie H.
    Badami, Madhav G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 251
  • [39] Tax calculation proposal for waste collection based on the amount of residential solid waste
    Athayde Junior, Gilson Barbosa
    Onofre, Fabiana Lima
    de Sa Beserra, Leila Brunet
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 36 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [40] An optimal combination of emissions tax and green innovation subsidies for polluting oligopolies
    Yi, Yongxi
    Wei, Zhongjun
    Fu, Chunyan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 284