A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Analysing Cohesive Devices in Expository Writing by Asian EFL Teachers

被引:3
作者
Bui Phu Hung [1 ]
Quang Nhat Nguyen [2 ]
Loc Tan Nguyen [1 ]
Nguyen Thi Viet [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] HQT Educ, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Hong Duc Univ, Thanh Hoa, Vietnam
来源
3L-LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE-THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES | 2021年 / 27卷 / 02期
关键词
L2; writing; cohesive devices; error analysis; discourse analysis; cohesion error patterns; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.17576/3L-2021-2702-02
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Recent research has shown that cohesive devices contribute substantially to writing quality and reveal L2 writers' information, such as first or native language. This quantitative study adopted a cross-linguistic approach to investigating the use of cohesive devices in expository writing by Asian EFL teachers compared to native English teachers. The study involved 80 participants from three different L1 backgrounds, including 28 Vietnamese, 26 Filipino, and 26 native English teachers. The Vietnamese and Filipino teachers were at a comparable level of English proficiency. Around 800 words were randomly selected from each participant's reports for analysis. Results from One-Way ANOVA showed that the Vietnamese and Filipino teachers used a similar pattern of cohesion with lexical cohesion being used most frequently, followed by reference and conjunction. In contrast, the cohesive devices used by the native English teachers dispersed more widely across five main categories. The results further showed that the native English teachers used more cohesive devices in writing than the Vietnamese and Filipino teachers separately. Results from the Independent-Samples T-test showed omission and redundancy to be the two most common error types by both the Vietnamese and Filipino teachers. The study has implications for L2 writing and pedagogy.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 30
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Processing of cohesive ties by EFL Arab college students [J].
Al-Jarf, RS .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2001, 34 (02) :141-151
[2]   The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge on the Reading Comprehension of Saudi EFL Learners [J].
Al-Khasawneh, Fadi .
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2019, 5 (03) :24-34
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, COLLABORATING COHERE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Commun
[5]  
Berzlanovich I., 2012, Constraints in Discourse 3: Representing and Inferring Discourse Structure, P137, DOI DOI 10.1075/PBNS.223.06BER
[6]  
Castro Carolyn D., 2004, Asia Pacific Education Review, V5, P215
[7]   Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language [J].
Chiang, SY .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 1999, 83 (02) :219-232
[8]  
Clouet R, 2017, LFE-REV LENGUAS FINE, V23, P313
[9]  
Collins P., 2010, ENGLISH GRAMMAR
[10]   GOOD AND POOR ELEMENTARY READERS USE OF COHESION IN WRITING [J].
COX, BE ;
SHANAHAN, T ;
SULZBY, E .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1990, 25 (01) :47-65