Effect of Cognitive Distraction on Physiological Measures and Driving Performance in Traditional and Mixed Traffic Environments

被引:4
作者
Hua, Qiang [1 ]
Jin, Lisheng [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Yuying [3 ]
Guo, Baicang [1 ]
Xie, Xianyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Transportat Coll, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
[2] Yanshan Univ, Sch Vehicle & Energy, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, China Japan Union Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MOBILE PHONE USE; DRIVER DISTRACTION; YOUNG DRIVERS; TAKEOVER TIME; VEHICLE; IMPACT; LOOKING; VISION; GAZE; REAL;
D O I
10.1155/2021/6739071
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Distracted driving is a dominant cause of traffic accidents. In addition, with the rapid development of intelligent vehicles, mixed traffic environments are expected to become more complicated with multiple types of intelligent vehicles sharing the road, thereby increasing the opportunities for distracted driving. However, the existing research on detecting driver distraction in mixed traffic environments is limited. Therefore, in this study, we analysed the effect of cognitive distraction on the driver physiological measures and driving performance in traditional and mixed traffic environments and compared the parameters extracted in the two environments. Sixty drivers were involved in the data collection, which included normal driving and two distracting tasks while driving in a simulator. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to examine the effect of cognitive distraction and traffic environments on all parameters. The results indicate that the effects of the pupil diameter, standard deviations (SDs) of the horizontal and vertical fixation angles, blink frequency, speed, SD of the lane positioning (SDLP), SD of the steering wheel angle (SDSWA), and steering entropy (SE) were significant. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for identifying the most appropriate parameters to detect cognitive distraction in traditional and mixed traffic environments to help reduce traffic accidents.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SAE Standard J2944
[2]   Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance [J].
Beede, KE ;
Kass, SJ .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2006, 38 (02) :415-421
[3]   The impact of different mobile phone tasks on gait behaviour in healthy young adults [J].
Bovonsunthonchai, Sunee ;
Ariyaudomkit, Rattapha ;
Susilo, Taufik Eko ;
Sangiamwong, Preyanan ;
Puchaphan, Punnapa ;
Chandee, Supatra ;
Richards, Jim .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2020, 19
[4]   A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving [J].
Caird, Jeff K. ;
Johnston, Kate A. ;
Wiliness, Chelsea R. ;
Asbridge, Mark ;
Steel, Piers .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2014, 71 :311-318
[5]   High-Resolution Vehicle Trajectory Extraction and Denoising From Aerial Videos [J].
Chen, Xinqiang ;
Li, Zhibin ;
Yang, Yongsheng ;
Qi, Lei ;
Ke, Ruimin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (05) :3190-3202
[6]   Identification of common features of vehicle motion under drowsy/distracted driving: A case study in Wuhan, China [J].
Chen, Zhijun ;
Wu, Chaozhong ;
Zhong, Ming ;
Lyu, Nengchao ;
Huang, Zhen .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2015, 81 :251-259
[7]   Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour [J].
Choudhary, Pushpa ;
Velaga, Nagendra R. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 106 :370-378
[8]   Analysis of vehicle-based lateral performance measures during distracted driving due to phone use [J].
Choudhary, Pushpa ;
Velaga, Nagendra R. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 44 :120-133
[9]   Visuomotor control of steering: the artefact of the matter [J].
Cloete, Steven ;
Wallis, Guy .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 208 (04) :475-489
[10]   The Impact of Eye Movements and Cognitive Workload on Lateral Position Variability in Driving [J].
Cooper, Joel M. ;
Medeiros-Ward, Nathan ;
Strayer, David L. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2013, 55 (05) :1001-1014