The use of real options approach in energy sector investments

被引:139
作者
Fernandes, Bartolomeu [1 ]
Cunha, Jorge [1 ]
Ferreira, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Dept Prod & Syst, P-4800058 Guimardes, Portugal
关键词
Renewable energy sources; Energy sector; Real options; Project evaluation; RENEWABLE ENERGY; GENERATION CAPACITY; VALUATION; ELECTRICITY; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; FLEXIBILITY; ADOPTION; ASSETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.102
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy shortage, global warming, and climate change led to an increase in the use of alternative sources of energy, with renewable energy sources (RES) playing a fundamental role in this new energetic paradigm. However, the investment costs often constitute a major barrier to their spread use. Moreover, the overall benefits of renewable energy technologies are often not well understood and consequently they are often evaluated to be not as cost effective as traditional technologies. From the moment that the energy sector started a deregulation process, with a high level of competitiveness and associated increased market uncertainty, traditional project evaluation techniques alone became insufficient to properly deal with these additional risk and uncertainty factors. The diffusion of the renewable energy technologies is also affected by this feature. The way investors evaluate their investments call now for the use of more sophisticated evaluation techniques. Real options approach can deal with these issues and, as so, began to be considered and applied for the energy sector decision aid. This approach it is now extensively widespread in evaluating investment projects in the energy sector. A large set of applications in almost all fields of energy decision making, from electricity generation technologies appraisal to policy evaluation is available in the literature. However the use of this technique in the field of RES is still limited and worth to be analysed. This paper addresses this issue. A review of the current state of the art in the application of real options approach to investments in non-renewable energy sources and RES is presented, giving perspectives for further research in this field. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4491 / 4497
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Valuation of Long-Term Investments in Energy Assets under Uncertainty [J].
Abadie, Luis M. .
ENERGIES, 2009, 2 (03) :738-768
[2]  
Amram M., 1999, REAL OPTIONS
[3]   Incorporating technical uncertainty in real option valuation of oil projects [J].
Armstrong, M ;
Galli, A ;
Bailey, W ;
Couët, B .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 44 (1-2) :67-82
[4]   Capital budgeting, technological innovation and the emerging competitive environment of the electric power industry [J].
Awerbuch, S .
ENERGY POLICY, 1996, 24 (02) :195-202
[5]   Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada [J].
Bennouna, Karim ;
Meredith, Geoffrey G. ;
Marchant, Teresa .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2010, 48 (1-2) :225-247
[6]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[7]  
Blyth W., 2007, Climate Policy Uncertainty and Investment Risk
[8]  
BLYTH W., 2006, Impact of Climate Change Policy Uncertainty in Power Investment
[9]   Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects [J].
Bockman, Thor ;
Fleten, Stein-Erik ;
Juliussen, Erik ;
Langhammer, Havard J. ;
Revdal, Ingemar .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (01) :255-267
[10]  
Bonis SA, 2009, CUAD ECON DIR EMPRES, V38, P065