A novel Hybrid Wavelet-Locally Weighted Linear Regression (W-LWLR) Model for Electrical Conductivity (EC) Prediction in Surface Water

被引:65
作者
Ahmadianfar, Iman [1 ]
Jamei, Mehdi [2 ]
Chu, Xuefeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Behbahan Khatam Alanbia Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Behbahan, Iran
[2] Shohadaye Hoveizeh Univ Technol, Dept Engn, Dasht E Azadegan, Susangerd, Iran
[3] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fargo, ND USA
关键词
SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; QUALITY PARAMETERS; NEURAL-NETWORK; DISSOLVED-OXYGEN; CHLOROPHYLL-A; RIVER; ALGORITHM; HYDROLOGY; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103641
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rivers are the most common and vital sources of water, which play a fundamental role in ecological systems and human life. Water quality assessment is a major element of managing water resources and accurate prediction of water quality is very essential for better management of rivers. The electrical conductivity (EC) is known as one of the most important water quality parameters to predict salinity and mineralization of water. The present study introduces a novel hybrid waveletlocally weighted linear regression (W-LWLR) method to predict the monthly EC of the Sefidrud River in Iran. 240 monthly discharge (Q) and EC samples, over a period of 20 years, were collected. The data were divided into two frequency components at two decomposition levels using the mother wavelet Bior 6.8. To compare the performance of various methods, the standalone LWLR, support vector regression (SVR), wavelet support vector regression (W-SVR), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), wavelet ARIMA (W-ARIMA), multivariate linear regression (MLR), and wavelet MLR (W-MLR) were also used. The discrete wavelet transform (DWT) was coupled with the LWLR, SVR, and ARIMA to create the W-LWLR, W-SVR, W-ARIMA methods to predict the EC parameter. The comparisons demonstrated that the W-LWLR was more accurate and efficient than the LWLR, SVR, W-SVR, ARIMA, and W-ARIMA methods. The correlation coefficient (R) values were 0.973, 0.95, 0.565, 0.473, 0.425, 0.917 for the W-LWLR, W-SVR, LWLR, SVR, ARIMA, and W-ARIMA methods, respectively. Further, the root mean square error (RMSE) of W-LWLR was 89.78, while the corresponding values for W-SVR, LWLR, SVR, ARIMA, W-ARIMA, MLR, and W-MLR were 123.50, 319.95, 341.20, 350.153, 155.292, 351.774, and 157.856 respectively. The overall comparison metrics and error analysis demonstrated the superiority of the new proposed W-LWLR method for water quality prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Prediction of local scour around circular piles under waves using a novel artificial intelligence approach [J].
Ahmadianfar, Iman ;
Jamei, Mehdi ;
Chu, Xuefeng .
MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) :44-55
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1948, QUALITY WATER IRRIGA
[3]  
Atkeson CG, 1997, ARTIF INTELL REV, V11, P75, DOI 10.1023/A:1006511328852
[4]   Prediction of Water Quality Parameters Using ANFIS Optimized by Intelligence Algorithms (Case Study: Gorganrood River) [J].
Azad, Armin ;
Karami, Hojat ;
Farzin, Saeed ;
Saeedian, Amir ;
Kashi, Hamed ;
Sayyahi, Fatemeh .
KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (07) :2206-2213
[5]   Environmental factors as indicators of dissolved oxygen concentration and zooplankton abundance: Deep learning versus traditional regression approach [J].
Banerjee, Arnab ;
Chakrabarty, Moitreyee ;
Rakshit, Nabyendu ;
Bhowmick, Amiya Ranjan ;
Ray, Santanu .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 100 :99-117
[6]   Multi-step water quality forecasting using a boosting ensemble multi-wavelet extreme learning machine model [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Ozga-Zielinski, Bogdan .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 32 (03) :799-813
[7]   Application of wavelet-artificial intelligence hybrid models for water quality prediction: a case study in Aji-Chay River, Iran [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Adamowski, Jan ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (07) :1797-1819
[8]   Comparison of Wavelet-Based ANN and Regression Models for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting [J].
Budu, Krishna .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 19 (07) :1385-1400
[9]   Use of principal component scores in multiple linear regression models for prediction of Chlorophyll-a in reservoirs [J].
Çamdevyren, H ;
Demyr, N ;
Kanik, A ;
Keskyn, S .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 181 (04) :581-589
[10]   Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? - Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature [J].
Chai, T. ;
Draxler, R. R. .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 7 (03) :1247-1250