Estimating Functional Connectivity Networks via Low-Rank Tensor Approximation With Applications to MCI Identification

被引:27
作者
Jiang, Xiao [1 ]
Zhang, Limei [1 ]
Qiao, Lishan [1 ]
Shen, Dinggang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Liaocheng Univ, Sch Math Sci, Liaocheng 252059, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Biomed Res Imaging Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Korea Univ, Dept Brain & Cognit Engn, Seoul, South Korea
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Estimation; Correlation; Sociology; Topology; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Functional connectivity network; low-rank tensor approximation; pearson's correlation; partial correlation; sparse representation; group sparsity; MCI identification; ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION WORKGROUPS; DIAGNOSTIC GUIDELINES; NATIONAL INSTITUTE; BRAIN; DISEASE; RECOMMENDATIONS; FMRI; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2019.2950712
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Functional connectivity network (FCN) has become an increasingly important approach to gain a better understanding of the brain, as well as discover informative biomarkers for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Due to its importance, many FCN estimation methods have been developed in the past decades, including methods based on the classical Pearson's correlation, (regularized) partial correlation, and some higher-order variants. However, most of the existing methods estimate one FCN at a time, thus ignoring the possibly shared structure among FCNs from different subjects. Recently, researchers introduce group constraints (or population priors) into FCN estimation by assuming that FCNs are topologically identical across subjects. Obviously, such a constraint/prior is too strong to be satisfied in practice, especially when both patients and healthy subjects are involved simultaneously in the group. To address this problem, we propose a novel FCN estimation approach based on an assumption that the involved FCNs have similar but not necessarily identical topology. More specifically, we implement this idea under a two-step learning framework. First, we independently estimate FCNs based on traditional methods, such as Pearson's correltion and sparse representation, making sure that each FCN captures the specific properties of the corresponding subject. Then, we stack the estimated FCNs (in fact, their adjacency matrices) into a tensor, and refine the stacked FCNs via low-rank tensor approximation. Finally, we apply the improved FCNs to identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy controls, and achieve a higher classification accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1912 / 1920
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alzheimer's Association, 2016, Alzheimers Dement, V12, P459
[2]  
Alzheimers Association, 2015, Alzheimers Dement, V11, P332
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LIBSVM LIB SUPPORT V
[4]   Modelling with independent components [J].
Beckmann, Christian F. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (02) :891-901
[5]   Regularized estimation of large covariance matrices [J].
Bickel, Peter J. ;
Levina, Elizaveta .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2008, 36 (01) :199-227
[6]  
Bijsterbosch J., 2017, INTRO RESTING STATE
[7]  
Cecchi G., 2009, ADV NEURAL INFO PROC, V22, P252
[8]   Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data [J].
Cole, David M. ;
Smith, Stephen M. ;
Beckmann, Christian F. .
FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 4
[9]   The maturing architecture of the brain's default network [J].
Fair, Damien A. ;
Cohen, Alexander L. ;
Dosenbach, Nico U. F. ;
Church, Jessica A. ;
Miezin, Francis M. ;
Barch, Deanna M. ;
Raichle, Marcus E. ;
Petersen, Steven E. ;
Schlaggar, Bradley L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (10) :4028-4032
[10]   Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso [J].
Friedman, Jerome ;
Hastie, Trevor ;
Tibshirani, Robert .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2008, 9 (03) :432-441