CHARACTERIZING COUPLE DYSFUNCTION IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER

被引:15
作者
Miano, Annemarie [1 ,2 ]
Dziobek, Isabel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Roepke, Stefan [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Res Cluster Languages Emot, Berlin, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Hauptstr 47-51, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin Sch Mind, Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Psychiat, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
borderline personality disorder; romantic relationships; relationship quality; attachment; interpersonal functioning; relationship stability; conflict; WORKING MODELS; INTERPERSONAL DEPENDENCY; SOCIAL-PARTICIPATION; RELATIONSHIP QUALITY; ATTACHMENT STYLES; ADULT ATTACHMENT; SELF-ESTEEM; DSM-IV; BIAS; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1521/pedi_2018_32_388
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Relationship dysfunction is a key criterion of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Nevertheless, little is known about the characteristics of romantic relationship functioning in BPD. In this study, couples in which the women were diagnosed with BPD (BPD couples) and healthy control couples (HC) were compared in their perceived relationship characteristics (e.g., relationship quality) and interpersonal experience variables (e.g., attachment). The hypothesis was tested that insecure attachment styles account for group differences in relationship characteristics. Variables were measured by self-report. Romantic relationships were appraised as more negative and conflictual by both members of BPD couples compared to HC. The perception of women with BPD was often more negative than that of their male partners, indicating potential biases in BPD patients' relationship evaluation. Insecure attachment styles only partially explained group differences in relationship characteristics, showing that attachment style is one, but not the only predictor of decreased relationship functioning in BPD couples.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 198
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Attachment studies with borderline patients: A review [J].
Agrawal, HR ;
Gunderson, J ;
Holmes, BM ;
Lyons-Ruth, K .
HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 12 (02) :94-104
[2]   Interpretation bias in Cluster-C and borderline personality disorders [J].
Arntz, Arnoud ;
Weertman, Anoek ;
Salet, Sjoerd .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2011, 49 (08) :472-481
[3]  
Association A.P, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[4]   Dependency and insecurity in romantic relationships: Development and validation of two companion scales [J].
Attridge, M ;
Berscheid, E ;
Sprecher, S .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1998, 5 (01) :31-58
[5]   Interpersonal evaluation bias in borderline personality disorder [J].
Barnow, Sven ;
Stopsack, Malte ;
Grabe, Hans Joergen ;
Meinke, Claudia ;
Spitzer, Carsten ;
Kronmueller, Klaus ;
Sieswerda, Simkje .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2009, 47 (05) :359-365
[6]   ATTACHMENT STYLES AMONG YOUNG-ADULTS - A TEST OF A 4-CATEGORY MODEL [J].
BARTHOLOMEW, K ;
HOROWITZ, LM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) :226-244
[7]  
Beck A. T., 2004, COGNITIVE THERAPY PE, DOI [10.1037/e706442007-005, DOI 10.1037/E706442007-005]
[8]   Interpersonal dependency and personality pathology: Variations in Rorschach Oral Dependency scores across Axis II diagnoses [J].
Bornstein, RF ;
Helsenroth, MJ ;
Padawer, JR ;
Fowler, JC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2000, 75 (03) :478-491
[9]   INTERPERSONAL DEPENDENCY IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER: CLINICAL CONTEXT AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE [J].
Bornstein, Robert F. ;
Becker-Matero, Nikaya ;
Winarick, Daniel J. ;
Reichman, Audrey L. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2010, 24 (01) :109-127
[10]   Relationship Quality and Stability in Couples When One Partner Suffers From Borderline Personality Disorder [J].
Bouchard, Sebastien ;
Sabourin, Stephane ;
Lussier, Yvan ;
Villeneuve, Evens .
JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2009, 35 (04) :446-455