Performance measurement systems in higher education: How levers of control reveal the ambiguities of reforms

被引:26
作者
Pilonato, Silvia [1 ]
Monfardini, Patrizio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, Via Santo 33, I-35123 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Cagliari, Dept Econ & Business Sci, Via St Ignazio da Laconi 17, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
关键词
Higher education; Performance measurement systems; Levers of control; Reforms; MANAGEMENT CONTROL-SYSTEMS; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY; UNIVERSITIES; INNOVATIONS; BUREAUCRACY; SECTOR; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2020.100908
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the introduction of new performance measurement system (PMS) for measuring teaching performance in Universities. The adoption of such PMS should prompt significant changes in existing control processes, but the goals of reform do not automatically translate into the desired organisational responses. Given the impact of PMS on management controls, the nature of such ambiguities may be better investigated using a framework that allows management control systems (MCS) to be taken in account. This paper investigates key actors' perceptions regarding the introduction of PMS through the lens of the levers of control (Simons, 1995, 2000). A qualitative analysis is conducted on interviews held with Italian university teaching managers and heads of programmes to examine the ambiguities arising from the implementation of a PMS. Several ambiguities emerge, both within and between the levers analysed, suggesting some reasons for the (partial) ineffectiveness of PMS reforms. In particular, the belief systems lever is crucial in making reforms acceptable, bureaucratic procedures are important in the diagnostic control systems lever, and performance indicators operate as a boundary system lever. Our findings show that administrative and academic actors perceive the interactive control capacity of PMS differently. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abernathy M.A., 1996, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V13, P569, DOI [10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.TB00515.X]
[2]   The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study [J].
Abernethy, MA ;
Brownell, P .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1999, 24 (03) :189-204
[3]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[4]   Management control systems and research management in universities An empirical and conceptual exploration [J].
Agyemang, Gloria ;
Broadbent, Jane .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2015, 28 (07) :1018-1046
[5]   ACCOUNTING REFORMS: DETERMINANTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS' CHOICES [J].
Anessi-Pessina, Eugenio ;
Nasi, Greta ;
Steccolini, Ileana .
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 24 (03) :321-342
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area
[7]  
[Anonymous], RAPPORTO STATO SISTE
[8]  
[Anonymous], ACCR PER SED CORS ST
[9]   The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy; A levers of control perspective [J].
Arjalies, Diane-Laure ;
Mundy, Julia .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (04) :284-300
[10]  
Arnaboldi M., 2003, Public Management Review, V5, P345, DOI [10.1080/1471903032000146946, DOI 10.1080/1471903032000146946]