Counterpoints about predatory open access and knowledge publishing in Africa

被引:29
作者
Nwagwu, Williams Ezinwa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Africa, Dept Informat Sci, ZA-0003 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
ONLINE;
D O I
10.1087/20150205
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The promise of open access (OA) as a replacement for existing scientific information dissemination ethos and practice has been contentious, with the interests of different stakeholders countries, publishers, and OA activists, among others clashing on an unprecedented scale. This paper examines some of the challenges that have been triggered by the OA movement, particularly at the Africa regional level. Basically, OA is technology heavy and its economic arrangements benefit mainly the developed world. There is evidence of OA initiatives in Africa, but these initiatives are mainly individually based, defragmented, and largely underdeveloped, and sometimes predatory. This author argues that policy-makers in Africa need to embrace OA and establish useful policies for regional journals and regional repositories and for academic reward, and support this with technical investment to enable quality online publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Adomi E., 2003, LEARN PUBL, V16, P12
[2]   Improving online acess to medical information for low-income countries [J].
Aronson, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (10) :966-968
[3]  
Arunachalam S., 2003, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, V29, P16, DOI 10.1002/bult.286
[4]  
Arunachalam S, 2004, NATL MED J INDIA, V17, P289
[5]  
Arunachalam S., 2012, OPEN ACCESS SCHOLARL
[6]  
Beall J., 2010, Charleston Advisor, V11, P10, DOI DOI 10.5260/CHARA.12.1.50
[7]  
Beall J., 2013, ANN MED SURG
[8]  
Beall J., 2010, CHARLESTON ADVISOR, V12, P50, DOI [10.5260/chara.12.1.50, DOI 10.5260/CHARA.12.1.50]
[9]  
Beall J., 2013, J INFORM ETHICS, V22, P11, DOI [DOI 10.3172/JIE.22.1.11, 10.3172/JIE.22.1.11]
[10]  
Beall J., 2009, CHARLESTON ADVISOR, V11, P29