The effect of eccentric training at different velocities on cross-education

被引:47
作者
Farthing, JP [1 ]
Chilibeck, PD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Kinesiol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C2, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
resistance training; strength; neural adaptations; hypertrophy; electromyography;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-003-0841-3
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine whether cross-education, defined as the increase in strength of an untrained limb after training of the contralateral homologous limb, is specific to low and high velocity eccentric training. Twenty-six subjects were randomized into two groups (n = 13 each) that performed unilateral eccentric training of the elbow flexors on an isokinetic dynamometer at velocities of either 30degrees s(-1) (0.52 rad s(-1)) or 180degrees s(-1) (3.14 rad s(-1)). Subjects trained three times per week for 8 weeks. Ten subjects served as controls and did not train. Subjects were tested before and after training for peak torque of the elbow flexors during eccentric and concentric contractions at 30degrees s(-1) and 180degrees s(-1). Eccentric peak torque at the velocity of 180' s-1 in the untrained arm increased only for the group that trained at that velocity (P < 0.05). There were no other changes in untrained arms for any of the groups at velocities of 30degrees s(-1) or 180degrees s(-1). For the trained arm, the increase in eccentric torque (pooled over velocities) was greatest for the group training at 180degrees s(-1), whereas the increase in concentric torque was similar for the groups training at 30degrees s(-1) and 180degrees s(-1). For the trained arm, there was no specificity for velocity or contraction type. We conclude that cross-education was specific to contraction type and velocity when fast (but not slow) eccentric contractions were used during training; whereas there was no specificity of training in the trained arm.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 577
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction:: effects of resistance training [J].
Aagaard, P ;
Simonsen, EB ;
Andersen, JL ;
Magnusson, SP ;
Halkjær-Kristensen, J ;
Dyhre-Poulsen, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 89 (06) :2249-2257
[2]   Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women [J].
Abe, T ;
DeHoyos, DV ;
Pollock, ML ;
Garzarella, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 81 (03) :174-180
[3]   Co activation and tension-regulating phenomena during isokinetic knee extension in sedentary and highly skilled humans [J].
Amiridis, IG ;
Martin, A ;
Morlon, B ;
Martin, L ;
Cometti, G ;
Pousson, M ;
vanHoecke, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 73 (1-2) :149-156
[4]   VELOCITY SPECIFICITY OF RESISTANCE TRAINING [J].
BEHM, DG ;
SALE, DG .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 15 (06) :374-388
[5]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS TO VELOCITY-CONTROLLED RESISTANCE TRAINING [J].
BELL, GJ ;
WENGER, HA .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1992, 13 (04) :234-244
[6]  
BELL GJ, 1992, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V32, P10
[7]   POSITIVE ADAPTATIONS TO WEIGHT-LIFTING TRAINING IN THE ELDERLY [J].
BROWN, AB ;
MCCARTNEY, N ;
SALE, DG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 69 (05) :1725-1733
[8]  
Chilibeck PD, 1998, EUR J APPL PHYSIOL O, V77, P170
[9]   SPECIFICITY OF POWER IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH SLOW AND FAST ISOKINETIC TRAINING [J].
COYLE, EF ;
FEIRING, DC ;
ROTKIS, TC ;
COTE, RW ;
ROBY, FB ;
LEE, W ;
WILMORE, JH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 51 (06) :1437-1442
[10]   EFFECT OF VOLUNTARY VS ARTIFICIAL ACTIVATION ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF MUSCLE TORQUE TO SPEED [J].
DUDLEY, GA ;
HARRIS, RT ;
DUVOISIN, MR ;
HATHER, BM ;
BUCHANAN, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 69 (06) :2215-2221