Catastrophe Theory Based Multi-criteria Decision Making Method of Smart Phone Evaluation

被引:0
作者
Wang, Baolong [1 ]
Wang, Chenglong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Polytech Univ, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
来源
2015 5th International Conference on Applied Social Science (ICASS 2015), Pt 1 | 2015年 / 80卷
关键词
Smart phone; MCDM; Catastrophe theory; Fuzzy mathematics; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As smart phones play a more and more important role in modem society, they have been an essential part of our daily life. With the rapid and widespread growth of information technology, numerous smart phones are available for users to choose and use. Selecting a suitable smart phone answering many purposes does matter. At first, the evaluation index system should be constructed by the most desirable features that influence the selection result. Secondly, based on catastrophe theory and fuzzy mathematics, a fuzzy catastrophe process method of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is proposed to evaluate and select the most suitable smart phone for users. Without the determination of index weights, the proposed method can obtain more reasonable results by avoiding the subjective judgment. The actual experiment shows that the proposed fuzzy catastrophe progress method is feasible and its operation is quite simple for decision makers in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 60
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones
    Chae, M
    Kim, J
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 23 (03) : 165 - 181
  • [2] Mobile phone ownership and usage among pre-adolescents
    Davie, Ronald
    Panting, Charlotte
    Charlton, Tony
    [J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2004, 21 (04) : 359 - 373
  • [3] A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using Cusp Catastrophe Theory
    Dou, Wenyu
    Ghose, Sanjoy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2006, 59 (07) : 838 - 848
  • [4] Larose R., 1998, ADV TELECOMMUNICATIO, V15, P1
  • [5] Poston I., 1979, CATASTROPHE THEORY I, V1st
  • [6] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [7] The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: Was the baby thrown out with the bathwater?
    Rosser, J. Barkley, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (10) : 3255 - 3280
  • [8] Catastrophe theory to assess water security and adaptation strategy in the context of environmental change
    Wang Xiao-jun
    Zhang Jian-yun
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Xia Xing-hui
    He Rui-min
    Shang Man-ting
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2014, 19 (04) : 463 - 477
  • [9] To learn or not to learn from project monitoring feedback: In search of explanations for the contractor's dichromatic responses
    Wong, Peter S. P.
    Wong, Sam K. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (04) : 676 - 686
  • [10] A catastrophe model of construction conflict behavior
    Yiu, KTW
    Cheung, SO
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (04) : 438 - 447