Evaluation of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study

被引:37
作者
Rossi, Roberto [1 ]
Bruzzone, Matteo [2 ]
Bonasia, Davide Edoardo [2 ]
Marmotti, Antonio [1 ]
Castoldi, Filippo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, I-10128 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Mauriziano Umberto I Hosp, I-10128 Turin, Italy
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; Rotational alignment; Tibial component; Cadaver study; Surgical technique; PATELLAR TRACKING; MALROTATION; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-009-1023-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Various techniques exist for establishing tibial rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to establish the most precise and reproducible method to assess tibial component rotational alignment during TKA by comparing the flexion-extension technique (ROM) and the Posterior-lateral Corner Locked Technique (PLCL). Twenty posterior stabilized TKAs were performed on cadavers. The rotation angles of the tibial components obtained using the two techniques were evaluated. The tibial component rotation axis obtained using the ROM technique and the PLCL method averaged, respectively, 0.35A degrees (+/- 4.2A degrees) externally rotated and 0.34A degrees (+/- 3A degrees) internally rotated to the Akagi line. No significant differences between the two methods were found and a high correlation exists between the two techniques (Pearson's coefficient = 0.88). The ROM and PLCL techniques are both precise and reproducible methods to assess tibial component rotation during TKA. However, while the ROM technique is dependent on the correct positioning of the femoral component and the soft tissue balancing, the PCLC method is easier if a complete visualization of the posterior-lateral corner of the cut tibial plateau is achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 893
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Akagi M, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P155
[2]   An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty [J].
Akagi, M ;
Oh, M ;
Nonaka, T ;
Tsujimoto, H ;
Asano, T ;
Hamanishi, C .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (420) :213-219
[3]  
Barrack RL, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P46
[4]   Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty [J].
Berger, RA ;
Crossett, LS ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Rubash, HE .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (356) :144-153
[5]  
DONALD GE, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V318, P176
[6]  
ECKHOFF DG, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P28
[7]  
FRANKIE MG, 1998, J ARTHROPLASTY, V13, P812
[8]   Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement - A comparison of two techniques [J].
Ikeuchi, M. ;
Yamanaka, N. ;
Okanoue, Y. ;
Ueta, E. ;
Tani, T. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (01) :45-49
[9]   Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella - Implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty [J].
Incavo, SJ ;
Coughlin, KM ;
Pappas, C ;
Beynnon, BD .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (05) :643-648
[10]  
Insall J N., 1993, Surgery of the Knee, V2nd, P739